On 2026 Aug 06 09:25:36, you wrote to All: TV> Is there a generally accepted limit on message size now in FidoNet? there never really was... the spec says message bodies are unbounded... back in the 90s i semi-regularly tested one of my message posting tools with the entire 2+Meg nodelist by posting the nodelist in one message in FIDOTEST... the results were interesting and not really unexpected... i was kind of also low-key doing it to hopefully spur some more development of tossers and bbses to handle large messages... any artificial limits on message size that were in place were mainly due to coders not taking the time to figure out how to swap overflow to disk storage, continue processing at a slower rate, and how to evict messages that simply could not fit in the availavle storage... all this while also processing mail for further distribution to other systems... leaf nodes generally have it easiest... in the late 90s or early 00s, i do remember seeing a post by a coder talking about how he did figure out swapping so his system could process large messages... i forget which software it was, though... i want to say it was one that had bbs, tosser, and mailer all in one package but it was quite a while back and a lot of water has flowed under the bridges... technical details: some systems had a stack size of 16k... that's all they could fit in memory at once... heap memory was not available... some systems also ran off multiple floppy drives and the operators had to swap disks for users so they could access files or messages that were on offline disks in a storage box... hard drives appeared and storage was easier to deal with... stack sizes also increased to 64k... then EMS and XMS memory access and yeah... there are still some older systems online for historic and nostalgic reasons... we don't hear about them very much these days... if there are any still connected to the net... )\\/(ark "The soul of a small kitten in the body of a mighty dragon. Look on my majesty, ye mighty, and despair! Or bring me catnip. Your choice. Oooh, a shiny thing!" ... The ability to understand a question from all sides meant one was totally unfi --- * Origin: (1:3634/12.73)
|