RW> RW> RW>>> Not on an analog station.  
    
  RW> RW> TW>> I am not talking abuut secondary Audio but Multiplexing of TV  
  RW> RW> TW>> signals on a digital Tv Transmitter.  
    
  RW> RW>> That's what I said.  
    
  RW> RW> RW> TW>>> The more channels of course means lower broadcast quality.  
  RW> RW> RW> TW>>> Here is a bit form the Internet:  
    
  RW> RW> RW> TW>>> Trinity Broadcasting Network stations has five SDTV  
  RW> RW> RW> TW>>> channels, the most of any large broadcaster in the  
  country.  
    
  RW> RW> RW>>> We have the same 5 Trinity channels in San Antonio...now what?  
    
  RW> RW> TW>> IF they are multiplexing you can get more than 5 TV signals  
  from  
  RW> RW> TW>> those 5 transmitters.  
    
  RW> RW>> Doubt it. That would be pushing the envelope too far and they'd be  
  RW> RW>> xmitting out of their allocated band frequency. As a HAM or HAM  
  RW> RW>> advocate, you should know that the very idea of xmitting on the  
  edge  
  RW> RW>> of a band will get you in trouble with the FCC.  
    
    
  RW> TW> Well there are stations doing it. Both Ch 8 & 10 here trasnmit  
  RW> TW> additional TV signals in addition to their Main Programing.  
    
  RW>Well, you do know that they don't transmit that programming on the edge  
  of  
  RW>their allocated bandwidth, don't you?  
    
  i NEVER said NOR implied that. IF you would go back you would see I  
  said the main channel definition had to be reduced IF subchannels are  
  transmitted  
    
  ---  
   Ç SLMR 2.1a Ç Typo Tom strikes agaoin  
   * Origin: TECHWARE BBS -  Since 1995  -  www.techware.dynip.com  
  (1:102/401)