Hi! Björn,  
    
  On 29/11/2014 12:37 PM, you wrote:  
    
   BF>     I've so far focused on Argus. It's still the original, very elegant  
   BF> source. But what additions (but a lot of added bugs) do y'all think  
  that  
   BF> Radius has?  
    
  Radius has some slightly better nodelist parsing ability.  (That could be  
  the  
  Nodelist Compiler bugfix by Alex in 2004.[shrug])  Of course, its biggest  
  advantage is the treatment of semaphores: having both a dedicated directory,  
  and the ability to add custom-designed semaphores.  
    
   BF>     I tend to stay with Argus. It's so much easier to maintain, and I  
   BF> don't see any real advantages with Radius, really.  
    
  Stay with what you feel is better.  I too appreciate good 'style' in  
  coding.  
  Argus by another name, by your hand, could a Good Thing.  8-)  
    
  P.S. When the time of general introduction of IPv6 comes, I will be  
  switching  
  to Linux.  I may have an XP VirtualBox or two but I would have to redo all  
  of  
  my batch scripts.  I've already done similar things in bash scripts, with  
  just  
  a couple of other tools to add in later.  
    
  Cheers,  
  Paul.  
    
  --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0  
   * Origin: Paul's Puppy 4.2.1 multiuser vBox - M'boro, Qld, OZ (3:640/1384)