BF>> Of course. I challenged it before he cast his vote (in a comment to  
   BF>> Roy).  
    
   RC> So I ask again, would you have done the "same thing" if Dallas had  
  voted  
   RC> for both you and Michiel?  
    
     I've already answered that question (se above). The answer is still the  
  same.  
    
   RC> I note today that RC30 voted no for you and yes to all the rest, to  
  what  
   RC> do you attribute his no vote that might be different from the other no  
   RC> votes you received?  
    
     I have no idea why, but a good guess is that they -- like so many  
  others --  
  think that this is a popularity contest.  
    
     People who wants the FTSC to remain a toothless tiger should make sure  
  that  
  nobody with outspoken opinions, who is not afraid to call things with it's  
  proper name of fear to become unpopular, should vote no to any such  
  candidate.  
    
     And vice versa of course...  
    
   RC> Also since you brought up voting and election protocol in your failed  
   RC> challenge, would you not find it odd that Michiel Van Der Vlist is  
   RC> himself counting the votes with himself being on the list of  
  candidates?  
   RC> Would not the proper thing to do is to have someone coordinate this  
   RC> election who has no standing to vote or be voted up or down?  
    
     Michiel's integrity is in my opinion way above any doubt, so I have  
  absolutely no problem with that.  
    
     If you, on the other hand, have problems with it, how come you didn't  
  object two years ago, when *you* were a candidate? The situation then was  
  exactly the same as now.  
    
  --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16)  
  Gecko/20101125  
   * Origin: news://felten.yi.org (2:203/2)