XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.atheism, alt.bible   
   XPost: alt.california   
   From: nonscrivetemi@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info   
      
   In article    
   Tim McGaughy  wrote:   
   >   
   > Wayne wrote:   
   > > "Tim McGaughy"  wrote in message   
   > > news:d6udnf8-a8q11LXUnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@posted.toastnet...   
   > >> Mike wrote:   
   > >>> On Nov 21, 12:04 pm, Emerson Wainwright   
   > >>>  wrote:   
   > >>>> On Nov 21, 7:46 am, Mike  wrote:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> On Nov 20, 9:19 pm, Emerson Wainwright    
   > >>>>> wrote:   
   > >>>>>> On Nov 20, 9:04 pm, Mike  wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> What case law is there that defines marriage as a right?   
   > >>>>>> Are you serious?   
   > >>>>>> Loving v. Virginia is one example.  Supreme Court of the United   
   > >>>>>> States.  "Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man'"   
   > >>>>> These justices were talking about marriage between men and women, be   
   > >>>>> they black or white.   
   > >>>> So what?  Do you think that won't apply to Asians and native Americans   
   > >>>> and Polynesians as well?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>  They definitely were not talking about gay   
   > >>>>> marriage,   
   > >>>> SO WHAT?   
   > >>> Marriage was unerstood by default to be between a man and a woman,   
   > >>> that's what.   
   > >> It was also understood to be between two people of the same race.   
   > >> Times change, and so does the definition of marriage.   
   > >>   
   > > Not in the minds of rational people.  After all, a man marrying a man is   
   > > just about the dumbest thing I ever heard of.   
   >   
   > Yeah, but you're a moron.   
      
   What does make you?  A sub-moron?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)