60e7b4c2   
   XPost: soc.support.fat-acceptance, rec.travel.air, rec.aviation.piloting   
   From: @   
      
   "Ragnar"  wrote in message   
   news:bc090c68-19c6-4f28-9eb8-eab4101b5aa0@x8g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...   
   > On Nov 25, 9:30 am, "Mike"  wrote:   
   > > "Ragnar"  wrote in message   
   > >   
   > > news:c7230a5c-c0e6-4d7c-9021-5c2fe49e68ee@o2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...   
   > >   
   > > > On Nov 24, 5:20 pm, "Mike"  wrote:   
   > > > > > Thank you captain obvious, that certainly is one reason for   
   > > > > > obesity   
   > > > > > but the issue is whether or not the individuals you are railing   
   > > > > > against are indeed obese for exactly that reason. In reality you   
   > > > > > really don’t know.   
   > >   
   > > > > OK, well it's the reason for at least 99.9% of them. Is that better,   
   > > > > captain technicality?   
   > >   
   > > > Really, do you have hard data to back those numbers?   
   > >   
   > > Do your own research. Stop being lazy and expecting others to do   
   > > everything   
   > > for you. It's part of the reason for your affliction.   
   > >   
   > Thank you for the typical answer from the typical individual that   
   > pulls numbers of if his or her ass. May I remind you that I was not   
   > the one that made the original claim and if you do not have the data   
   > to back it up then just admit that you are full of shit and be done   
   > with it.   
      
   What does being the one who "made the original claim" have to do with   
   anything?  Either you think the number is way out of line or you asked for   
   "proof" as part of your campaign to be a first rate chicken$hit (a title   
   you've already clinched).   
      
   If I'm wrong, where are all these people who are fat for other reasons?  I   
   know a lot of fat people, and all of them are fat because they are sedentary   
   and eat too many calories.  Now perhaps there is a place called Fatfcukstan   
   where millions of obese people eat sensibly and exercise regularly, but I'll   
   be damned if I can find it on any map.   
      
   The numbers pulled from "his or her ass" were specifically intended to be   
   just as unreasonable as the ridiculous point it was countering which would   
   be obvious to anyone warmer than a room temperature IQ.  You should learn to   
   read between the lines.  There's volumes of information you're missing out   
   on.   
      
   > BTW, how do you know what I’m afflicted with or whether or not I’m   
   > afflicted at all? You propensity for assumption when you actually know   
   > nothing is astounding.   
      
   How do you know what I was accusing you of being afflicted with?  Did you   
   just make an "assumption"?  Wow!  I kind of like your game of chicken$hit.   
      
   > > The truth hurts sometimes, I know, but that's why I provide it. Think of   
   > > it   
   > > as a flu shot for the chicken$hits.   
   >   
   > So now you are not only full of shit but you are the provider of the   
   > truth as well. How the hell does that work?   
      
   I'll be more than glad to enlighten you.  First, if you want to accuse   
   someone else of being "full of $hit", you should at least first prove them   
   wrong (assuming you don't want to be perceived as an idiot).  Now if you can   
   provide some sort of evidence that shows the vast majority of people AREN'T   
   fat by their own choice, then perhaps you would have succeeded in that task,   
   but so far you haven't which means it's simply your opinion against mine.   
   Furthermore, since mine happens to be the predominate one, the chances of   
   you being the one "full of $hit" are considerably higher, no?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)