XPost: soc.support.fat-acceptance, rec.travel.air, rec.aviation.piloting   
   From: @   
      
   "Jim Davis"  wrote in message   
   news:GfidndfGTaSFB7HUnZ2dnUVZ_tHinZ2d@supernews.com...   
   >   
   > "Mike"  wrote in message   
   > news:d9_Wk.961$QX3.548@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...   
   >> "Jim Davis"  wrote in message   
   >> news:iJCdnVfXA6181rHUnZ2dnUVZ_rfinZ2d@supernews.com...   
   >>>   
   >>> "Mike"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:twXWk.925$QX3.905@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...   
   >>>> "Robin King"  wrote in message   
   >>>   
   >>>>>    People have been trying all kinds of unhealthy things to lose   
   >>>>> weight, because the weight doesn't necessarily come flying off when   
   >>>>> they merely engage in healthy activities and healthy eating.  For   
   >>>>> societal purposes, it doesn't matter if you live a healthy lifestyle -   
   >>>>> you still get treated better if you're thinner, regardless of   
   >>>>> lifestyle.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Boofreakinhoo.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Life isn't fair.  Not everyone is born with the genetics to make them   
   >>>> super intelligent, attractive, thin, and athletic, but that doesn't   
   >>>> mean you shouldn't play the cards you are dealt.  Even if your   
   >>>> hereditary argument held any water whatsoever, that doesn't mean fat   
   >>>> people can't overcome their circumstances.  Whether they do are don't   
   >>>> is certainly their choice, but arguing that fat people are entitled to   
   >>>> extra privileges due to their self imposed problems   
   >>>   
   >>> They're not always self imposed problems.  There are lots of skinny   
   >>> people who have tried all their lives to gain a few pounds, and failed.   
   >>>   
   >>>>makes as much sense as arguing that stupid people are entitled to extra   
   >>>>privileges if they choose to remain uneducated or if ugly people don't   
   >>>>want to take a bath.   
   >>>   
   >>> What does "ugly" have to do with bathing?  You've just entered yourself   
   >>> in your "Stupid" classification.   
   >>   
   >> Wow, Jim, you bring up some irrelevant nonsense about skinny people, and   
   >> you have the nerve to question anyone else's analogies?   
   >   
   > How is it irrelevant?  It involves someone trying to improve and not   
   > suceeding, and is not always self imposing.   
      
   You could just as well have sung the song about the ant and the rubber tree   
   plant.  It would have made just as much sense.  Actually it would have made   
   more sense.  Just because someone tries and fails means nothing, Jimbo.   
   Your anecdotal nonsense has nothing to do with whether someone CAN do   
   something completely different from your false analogy, or whether it's   
   possible, practical, or even easy.   
      
   Let me put it in simpler terms that someone like you has a better chance of   
   understanding.  Let's say you just drove your thumb up your arse while you   
   held the other one in your mouth.  Then you tried your best not to swap   
   them, but failed.  Does this mean NOBODY or even the VAST MAJORITY of people   
   couldn't resist the urge to thrust a turd encrusted thumb into their mouth?   
   Nope, it doesn't, Jimbo.  Think hard on that one.  If you persist, you'll   
   figure it out eventually.   
      
      
   >> I'm quite glad you put me in your stupid column.  I'd be worried if you   
   >> hadn't.   
   >   
   > I put you nowhere.  Re-read the sentence.  You're so busy "Chubby Bashing"   
   > that you're not making sense.   
      
   When have you ever made sense, Jimbo?   
      
   You are the one doing the putting, Jimbo.  It was your opinion.  Rub those   
   two brain cells together and get them started.  I realize life is so much   
   harder because you're stupid, but that doesn't mean you should quit trying.   
   Just like the fatties shouldn't.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)