XPost: soc.support.fat-acceptance, rec.travel.air, rec.aviation.piloting
From: #$$9#@%%%.^^^
"Mike" wrote in message
news:ruVYk.2158$QX3.518@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
|
| You can't answer the question other than to simply repeat your previous
| nonsense.
|
| Diversion noted.
You're the one attempting to divert, and spewing your previous nonsense.
|
| It doesn't matter if there are hundreds or thousands of causes, pinhead.
|
| The PRIMARY cause is too many calories and/or not enough activity. You
| don't have to be a physicist to know the sky is blue and water is wet,
| either BTW.
And that you are just a dumb ass. BTSW.
|
| > As far as not finding anything on a map goes. Don’t think that it
| > proves anything other than you are stupid. It has been claimed that a
| > high percentage of people in the US can’t even locate North America on
| > a map, lol.
|
| Got any PROOF of that, proof-boy?
|
| No?
|
| Ooops, you must be full if $hit, then.
|
| But that was already quite apparent.
But you have no proof lamer, and you are the first with the burdon to show
such.
|
|
| > > The numbers pulled from "his or her ass" were specifically intended to
| > > be
| > > just as unreasonable as the ridiculous point it was countering which
| > > would
| > > be obvious to anyone warmer than a room temperature IQ. You should
learn
| > > to
| > > read between the lines. There's volumes of information you're missing
| > > out
| > > on.
| > >
| > “Read between the lines” BULLSHIT. Learn to back your comments
| > correctly before you open your mouth and if there are volumes of
| > scientific info to back your simplistic claims then try producing at
| > least one. After all, if there are volumes of such information it
| > should be relatively easy.
|
| Good job of proving you can't even read within the lines.
|
| Try again.
|
Nice hat dance Mikie, you try again
| > >
| > I don’t have to prove you wrong; this isn’t a point counterpoint
| > argument. The onus is on you to back your statements. I only asked for
| > some supporting data from were you formulated your claims. You appear
| > to be extremely unwilling to provide it so I have to assume you have
| > none and are full of shit. My opinion on the matter isn’t in question
| > furthermore I have not offered my opinion so it’s not an opinion
| > counter-opinion based argument. Learn to follow along logically for a
| > change.
|
| You haven't even so much as offered an opinion, proof-boy. You're nothing
| more than a troll who scours usenet for a chance to interject a
smart-arsed
| chicken$hit comment. I'm sure you think you're clever and original, but
the
| reality is usenet is full of schmucks like you who demand proof for
| everything but never offer any of their own.
|
| The problem you've gotten yourself into this time is my original statement
| was never intended to be absolute and you were too un-clever to realize
this
| before you stuck your foot in your mouth by demanding proof for an
| exaggeration which was obviously rhetorical, and you're the type that will
| never admit you're full of $hit. Now you're simply multiplying your
| foolishness.
|
| Keep up the good work.
|
Keep back peddling puss, you tripped on you crank again as usual.
You can lip all kind of shit, but as usual can't verify any of it.
What a lame puppy.
| > BTW, just because you claim that your opinion is the predominant
| > opinion means nothing. It’s only opinion and not necessarily fact.
| > Besides, if you are claiming that you are not “full of shit” because
| > your opinion falls inline with that of the many trolls here, then you
| > truly are full of shit, lol.
|
| I never represented it as anything other than my opinion, proof-boy.
|
Yes you did, trick puppy. And now you are waddling in bullshit as usual.
What a moron. You couldn't find your ass with both hands.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
