7afb67fb   
   XPost: alt.abortion, alt.atheism, alt.california   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
   From: nonscrivetemi@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info   
      
   In article <0c51be64-bb8d-4b52-b704-   
   0bae77f7d06e@t3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>   
   Emerson Wainwright  wrote:   
   >   
   > On Dec 1, 3:09 pm, Rudy Canoza  wrote:   
   > > dank...@rocketmail.com wrote:   
   > > > On Nov 30, 6:45 pm, "J"  wrote...   
   > > >> Could you imagine the circus if some jurisdiction did recognize 'gay   
   > > >> divorce'? Allowing a group of people, who by their own admission are   
   > > >> notoriously promiscuous, to sue each other on the grounds of adultery   
   > would   
   > > >> grind the justice system to a halt.   
   > >   
   > > > I'm gay, but when I pointed the same thing out in another newsgroup I   
   > > > was denounced as "homophobic."  I also noted that legalization of sam   
   > e-   
   > > > sex marriage would inevitably lead to legalization of polygamy.   
   > >   
   > > How could it not?  Exactly the same "equal protection" legal   
   > > considerations would necessarily apply, not to mention the same moral   
   > > ones (that people have some kind of moral right to be married to the   
   > > person(s) they love.)   
   >   
   > This issue would need further discussion.  As it stands, it's a   
   > slippery slope.  If X (same-sex marriage), then (OMG!) Y (polygamous   
   > marriage)!!!   
      
   What fucked up faggot logic.  See why everybody thinks you're   
   all fucked in the heads?  Faggots just don't view the world   
   correctly.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)