ab50be7e   
   XPost: alt.abortion, alt.atheism, alt.politics.homosexuality   
   XPost: tx.politics   
   From: rfischer@sonic.net   
      
   juanjo   wrote:   
   >On Oct 5, 4:25 pm, juanjo  wrote:   
   >> On Oct 5, 6:03 am, "Fartwick Chilton" an anonymous coward wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > In article <0afd4d04-2119-4354-af7c-   
   >> > 2e2ef83f8...@b25g2000prb.googlegroups.com>   
   >>   
   >> > juanjo  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > > Wash. Times continues to smear Jennings with false claim that he   
   >> > > failed to report "sexual abuse" of student   
   >>   
   >> > He broke the law you simpering liberal faggot.  Deal with it.   
   >>   
   >> If you bothered to read the article, you would not that the person in   
   >> question was above the age of consent and thus no law was broken.   
   >   
   >Fox has now retracted their story.  The young man in question revealed   
   >that Fox had contacted him prior to running the story and thus were   
   >aware of two critical facts.   
      
   What?  Fox news lied?  What're the odds?   
      
   >  First the young man in question was 16   
   >not 15 as Fox reported incorrectly.  Secondly, he told Fox that he met   
   >and had a discussion with an older man but that no sexual contact took   
   >place at that time.  So what we have is two people of legal age having   
   >a discussion in which the subject of homosexuality came up but no   
   >sexual activity took place.  Just exactly what crime was committed?   
      
   --   
   Ray Fischer   
   rfischer@sonic.net   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)