From: jim.richards65@yahoo.com   
      
   On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 18:48:47 -0000, "News"    
   wrote:   
      
   >Bob F wrote:   
   >> News wrote:   
   >>> "Jim Wilkins"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:jhpfnh$ts4$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "Curbie"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:plc0k7hhtm969l5qhunhr03dhn1shhmlv3@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I don't know what is more damaging about promoting "Magic" tech,   
   >>>>> ... ...or the overall notion that we can all just sit on our hands   
   >>>>> and do nothing, and wait for someone else to fix the huge energy   
   >>>>> problems we have.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Curbie   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The inactive majority probably doesn't matter.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The tiny pro-active percentage capable and willing to innovate, and   
   >>>> those who invest in them, probably would continue with or without   
   >>>> mass support. It's the reactives that puzzle me, those who actively   
   >>>> attack our   
   >>>> current energy sources but offer no credible alternatives.   
   >>>   
   >>> Air is free.   
   >>   
   >> Compressed air is not. It is not even efficient.   
   >   
   >It depends on its use   
      
   Right... the cost of compressed air may depend on its use in   
   La-La-Land, but NOT here in reality.   
   Seek psychiatric help, you're non compos mentis.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)