From: vaughnsimon@gmail.com   
      
   5/17/2012 2:27 PM, News wrote:   
   > Vaughn wrote:   
   >   
   >>> into the manufacturing side now. It is nice you   
   >>> are getting it.   
   >>   
   >> But you aren't"getting it".   
   >   
   > I did get it. I read the Tata press release. You know, about this car   
   > you said would never work because you did some sums.   
      
   Yet again, you trimmed my post and "answered" without addressing a   
   single thing of substance. It's obvious you are back to your trolling   
   ways, name-calling and provoking whilst never addressing the real issues.   
      
   Please notice that 1) After a decade of "progress" you can't yet point   
   to a single AirCar in customer's hands or ever subjected to an   
   independent 3rd-party test. 2) You have never shown the slightest   
   inclination to understand the physics behind air energy storage. 3) the   
   current incarnation of the Aircar is actually a fuel engine, (though,   
   like a Prius is may be capable of limited engine-off propulsion)   
      
   So you are welcome to show me where I have been proven wrong about the   
   AirCar, except I'm likely to not see your post, and will certainly not   
   bother responding to it.   
      
      
   Bye again!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)