92c7e08c   
   From: Killspam@invalid.kill   
      
   harry k wrote:   
   > On May 17, 2:51 pm, "News"  wrote:   
   >> harry k wrote:   
   >>> On May 17, 1:36 am, "News"  wrote:   
   >>>> Vaughn wrote:   
   >>>>> On 5/16/2012 9:26 AM, News wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>>>> "Vaughn"  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >>>>>>> Now Tata might have a market-ready product "over the coming   
   >>>>>>> years".   
   >>   
   >>>>>>> Tell us again News, what's changed over the last ten years?   
   >>   
   >>>>> This is your thread News. You started the discussion. Are you   
   >>>>> serious about discussing this or are you just trolling again?   
   >>   
   >>>> I never troll. I inform you of events.   
   >>   
   >>> Oddly, those "events" never come to fruition.   
   >>   
   >> The cars works of course beyond doubt, despite senile people doing   
   >> sums saying it will not. It looks they are to make it. Read Tata.   
   >> Amazing eh?   
   >   
   > Having a comprehension problem are you?  What part of "It isn't an air   
   > car" do you not understand? It runs on an IC engine fueled with   
   > hydrocarbons.   
      
   And soemtinme only 100% air.  Have you told Tata they are wrong?   
      
   > The   
   > only thing the "air thingy' has to do with it is for temporary power   
   > boosts.   
   >   
   > As such, no one said anything at all, pro or con on whether it will   
   > work.   
      
   You all said it would not work and Tata should know this, so you should   
   connect them. They have done all the testing and they thought it works.   
      
      
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)