From: spamme9@gmail.com   
      
   On 5/24/2012 3:47 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:   
   > "mike"  wrote in message   
   > news:jpmapp$f0d$1@dont-email.me...   
   >> ...   
   >> I'm amazed by the number of people who spend years and post   
   >> videos for free energy devices without ever measuring anything.   
   >> And the few that have a meter, don't measure energy.   
   >>   
   >> There oughta be a how-to guide for measuring power/energy,   
   >> but I'm too lazy to go look for it...but it'd probably cause   
   >> youtube to implode on itself.   
   >   
   > I used a $20,000 digitizing oscilloscope and $3000 DC current probe,   
   > and let the scope's math processor do the piecewise integration of   
   > stored samples.   
   >   
   > If you are on a home-experimenter budget with old surplus equipment,   
   > accurate AC power measurement is quite a challenge.   
      
   My point is that it IS NOT difficult at all.   
   IN the US, there's a wattmeter at the utility entrance.   
   OR   
   A $20 KillAWatt meter will do pretty well for AC powered stuff.   
   You can measure output power with a resistor, thermometer, stopwatch   
   and a pound of water.   
   The good news is that you don't need high accuracy at all.   
   Free energy does not obey the known laws of physics.   
   It's everywhere and in infinite supply, waiting to be tapped.   
   Any free energy device worth having will put out WAY, WAY   
   more power than you put in.  It will be very obvious that it is working.   
      
   I think that's the crux of the problem.  There probably have   
   been many successful free energy devices.  They just worked so well   
   that they destroyed themselves, the inventor and any evidence that they   
   ever existed.   
      
   I believe that a supernova are the results of successful free energy   
   devices developed elsewhere in the universe.  We've been lucky so far.   
      
      
   >   
   > Current measuring shunts like this can sometimes be found cheap in   
   > surplus stores, but not around here because I snap them up.   
   > http://www.emarineinc.com/product_images/w/736/shunt02__18613_zoom.jpg   
   >   
   > Inductive and Hall effect AC current probes often have a low enough   
   > bandwidth to misread complex waveforms. That includes Tek P6020   
   > passive current probes.   
   >   
   > jsw   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)