Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.energy.homepower    |    Electrical part of living of the grid    |    2,576 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,658 of 2,576    |
|    j to Bob F    |
|    Re: Is the E-Cat finally proven?    |
|    22 May 13 10:37:39    |
      From: mung_me@att.net              On 5/22/2013 10:07 AM, Bob F wrote:> Vaughn wrote:        >> On 5/22/2013 8:54 AM, amdx wrote:        >>> I'm curious, How much can you cool it before the reaction stops?        >>        >> Good question!        >>        >>> Is the resistance heating enough to keep the reaction going even when        >>> bathed in room temp water?        >>> Mikek        >> There is no particular reason for it to be bathed in room temperature        >> water. Assuming that the final use of the E-cat will be as the energy        >> source in a heat engine; the hotter the operating temperature, the        >> more useful and more efficient it will be.        >>        >> To power a commercial steam plant of useful efficiency, 400 degrees F.        >> is around the lower limit.        >>        >        > It would seem as if there is a power density problem with these devices,        > assuming there is any reality to these stories. If the previous test       melted the        > device down, clearly there are temp regulation problems, The latest test        > suggests that the temps can get high enough to be useful, but that       they have        > little faith in their ability to increase the energy level to useful       levels        > safely without destroying the device. Walmart won't have these for       awhile.              Yes,              There are a lot of fairly easy ways to remove some heat without cooling       too far. And it is much easier to accurately measure that heat that was       removed than averaging IR readings. Just add insulation and a cooling       fluid that could even be air. You can run it at any temperature needed       by adjusting coolant flow.              And you would have a device headed towards not only more accurate       measurements, but towards being "operational". I don't see Rossi doing this.              Accurate calorimetric readings are taken everywhere but by Rossi.              Regards,       Jeff              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca