XPost: rec.boats, sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.basic
XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.hvac
From: bobnospam@gmail.com
krw@attt.bizz wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 20:47:49 -0500, amdx wrote:
>
>> On 10/25/2013 7:20 PM, Bob F wrote:
>>> krw@attt.bizz wrote:
>>>>> Too bad your governor, who didn't believe the ACA would come to
>>>>> pass, didn't prepare your state for it, eh?
>>>>
>>>> Wrong again, dumbshit. His governor (and mine) didn't drink the
>>>> KoolAid, as yours obviously did.
>>>
>>> I just heard on the news that 36 states are having real problems
>>> with the federal site. Funny, but that's exactly how many states
>>> bagged out of their chance to do it themselves. There go those
>>> silly Republicans again, creating a problem, and then blaming it on
>>> anyone but themselves.
>>>
>>>
>> It's not the states having problems, it's the people in those
>> states relying on the Federal government site.
>
> The point being missed here is that apparently the states are capable
> of such a thing and the federal government isn't. The economies of
> scale should be working exactly the opposite way. Of course the
> federal site was a no-bid contract given to one of Moochell's buddies.
The fact is that the bill as passed was written for the states to do this job
as
they saw best, and funds were not include for the Feds to do the job for the
states. Then as time goes on, the right wing states chose to ignore their
responsibilty to their own citizens, so the feds had to pick up their slack,
but
the Republicans in congress still didn't accept paying for their
responsibility.
Every state that didn't opt-in screwed their own citizens by making it harder
to
sign up and denying them some coverages.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
