XPost: rec.boats, sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.basic
XPost: sci.electronics.repair, alt.hvac
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:52:09 -0700, "Bob F"
wrote:
>krw@attt.bizz wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 20:47:49 -0500, amdx wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/25/2013 7:20 PM, Bob F wrote:
>>>> krw@attt.bizz wrote:
>>>>>> Too bad your governor, who didn't believe the ACA would come to
>>>>>> pass, didn't prepare your state for it, eh?
>>>>>
>>>>> Wrong again, dumbshit. His governor (and mine) didn't drink the
>>>>> KoolAid, as yours obviously did.
>>>>
>>>> I just heard on the news that 36 states are having real problems
>>>> with the federal site. Funny, but that's exactly how many states
>>>> bagged out of their chance to do it themselves. There go those
>>>> silly Republicans again, creating a problem, and then blaming it on
>>>> anyone but themselves.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It's not the states having problems, it's the people in those
>>> states relying on the Federal government site.
>>
>> The point being missed here is that apparently the states are capable
>> of such a thing and the federal government isn't. The economies of
>> scale should be working exactly the opposite way. Of course the
>> federal site was a no-bid contract given to one of Moochell's buddies.
>
>The fact is that the bill as passed was written for the states to do this job
as
>they saw best, and funds were not include for the Feds to do the job for the
>states. Then as time goes on, the right wing states chose to ignore their
>responsibilty to their own citizens, so the feds had to pick up their slack,
but
>the Republicans in congress still didn't accept paying for their
responsibility.
>Every state that didn't opt-in screwed their own citizens by making it harder
to
>sign up and denying them some coverages.
>
You're lying again, but that's not surprising anyone.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
