From: muratlanne@gmail.com   
      
   "amdx"  wrote in message   
   news:m16mdd$ht1$1@dont-email.me...   
   >   
   >   Just an observer here with no physics knowledge, I've been   
   > following the LENR story since 2011. So three years and still lots   
   > of people saying it's a fraud, they don't understand calorimetry,   
   > the theory is wrong, etc.   
   >  On the other hand, there are plenty of papers with with data   
   > showing excess energy output, with reputations exposed.   
   >   
   >   Anyone care to pick this experiment apart.   
   > Or at least explain some of the data.   
      
      
   >  Our measurement, based on calculating the power emitted by the   
   > reactor through radiation and convection, ...   
      
   And there it is, they estimated the loss to smoke (convection) and   
   mirrors (radiation). For a credible test there would have been NO such   
   uncontrolled loss, all the heat produced would have gone into a   
   measurable temperature rise in a measurable weight of liquid coolant.   
      
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorimeter   
   "A reaction calorimeter is a calorimeter in which a chemical reaction   
   is initiated within a closed insulated container. Reaction heats are   
   measured and the total heat is obtained by integrating heatflow versus   
   time. This is the standard used in industry to measure heats since   
   industrial processes are engineered to run at constant temperatures."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)