XPost: sci.energy, alt.politics.democrats, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.global-warming   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Jim Wilkins"  wrote in message   
   news:u3qidk$2kdg5$1@dont-email.me...   
   > "Solar fraud"  wrote in message news:u3i0pv$j7o$1@toxic.dizum.net...   
   >   
   > Many governments in the Western world have committed to “net zero”   
   > emissions of carbon in the near future. The US and UK both say they will   
   > deliver by 2050. It's widely believed that wind and solar power can   
   > achieve this. This belief has led the US and British governments, among   
   > others, to promote and heavily subsidise wind and solar.   
      
   Which simply exports their pollution to the East...  If countries were   
   ACTUALLY after net zero then they would need to figure in ALL carbon   
   emissions from mineral extraction, through transportation, fabrication,   
   installation, operation, disposal, destruction, reclamation, reprocessing   
   and finally disposal of what remains.   
   Then consider while at the time they are trying to transition over.. they   
   are also working to MASSIVELY increase their demand for electricity.   
      
   The bitch is I had a net zero heating system.. and the local government made   
   me remove it.. something about burning wood was bad for the environment...   
   100% use of waste and discarded wood.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)