XPost: sci.physics   
   From: amdx@knology.net   
      
   On 10/31/2011 4:14 PM, amdx wrote:   
   > On 10/31/2011 1:46 AM, Morris Dovey wrote:   
   >> On 10/30/11 8:18 PM, amdx wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Sense you brought it up, I'm curious why you think fusion will start   
   >>> without the undisclosed catalyst. Do think the catalyst is just a ruse?   
   >>> I was thinking some of this was design for when the catalyst becomes   
   >>> known you will be ready.   
   >>   
   >> I don't know if it will or won't start, but I've been unable to make any   
   >> sense of his catalyst claim.   
   >>   
   >> In one public posting Rossi revealed that the catalyst was KaCO3 - which   
   >> I found amusing/interesting.   
   >>   
   >> I decided to start with just nickel and hydrogen. If that won't work,   
   >> I'll try adding CaCO3, and if that doesn't work I'll try K2CO3.   
   >>   
   >> Frankly, I do think the talk about catalyst /may/ be an attempt to muddy   
   >> the water. :-)   
   >>   
   >   
   > Here's some history of Ni/H fusion systems you might find interesting.   
   >   
   > http://blog.zorinaq.com/?e=61   
   >   
   > Mikek   
      
    From the blog above I gleaned this;   
   "....add a secret ingredient to break apart the molecular hydrogen (H2)   
   into atomic hydrogen (H1)."   
   I think that would be the catalyst.   
                  Mikek   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)