From: amdx@knologynotthis.net   
      
   On 1/21/2012 2:00 PM, Morris Dovey wrote:   
   > On 1/21/12 1:13 PM, amdx wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> The surprising thing (to me) is that with the inherent simplicity of   
   >>> this thing - and with an absolute plethora of possible applications -   
   >>> people aren't falling all over themselves to independently reproduce the   
   >>> results Rossi has reported. That people aren't doing so just boggles my   
   >>> mind.   
   >>   
   >> It does seem simple, except for a few details,   
   >> hmm...   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   >> Back to the details, creating the high surface area nickel of I suspect   
   >> the proper isotope.   
   >   
   > Rossi said he used most common isotope of filamentary nickel - this is   
   > extremely fine powder in a form where each grain has a high surface   
   > area. You can buy it on eBay ~$60/pound. Google images has microscope   
   > pictures.   
   >   
   >> Finding again, I suspect, a way to separate the H2   
   >> molecule to H1 and H1.   
   >   
   > In the original experimentation and in the more recent demonstrations   
   > plain old H2 gas was fed from the tank through a regulator and hose to a   
   > reaction chamber containing only nickel.   
   >   
   >> Getting the heat to the proper area to initiate   
   >> the reaction (?) and make the heater work the next time it is needed,   
   >> ie. not damaged by the heat of the reaction.   
   >   
   > You can see photos of his heating setup in most of the reports. It's   
   > pretty straight-forward.   
   >   
   >> Also if indeed the RF   
   >> stimulation is needed to sustain the reaction, getting it to the proper   
   >> area.   
   >   
   > The RF stimulation is a recent addition to the story. Since it wasn't   
   > needed to produce any of the reported early results, I'm assuming that   
   > it isn't necessary to the reaction.   
   >   
   >> Yes why aren't others hot on this.   
   >   
   > Yes why? It's hard to imagine that /everyone/ is trying to ake a hard   
   > problem out of an easy one...   
   >   
   >> Although there is some data found of others working on LENRs on somewhat   
   >> the same line as Rossi. (Time for a new google alert, LENR)   
   >> Why aren't the oil companies suppressing this, like 200 mile per gallon   
   >> carburetor. Ok the last line is just for laughs :-) (last 1/2 line):-{   
   >   
   > I'm not a conspiracist, but I'll guess that they feel about as   
   > threatened by LENR development as Kodak did by digital cameras back in   
   > the 70's and 80's. :-)   
   >   
     Kodak, wow, even into the 90's and 2000's they had a chance to take a   
   new business tack but, I didn't hear about the effort.   
                            Mikek   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)