XPost: alt.comp.freeware, alt.computer.workshop, alt.home.repair   
   From: nobody@haph.org   
      
   ~BD~  news:9sxuF.70871$rF5.43143@fx29.fr7 Thu, 31   
   Oct 2019 09:04:04 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote:   
      
   > On 31/10/2019 08:20, Diesel wrote:   
   >> ~BD~  news:0D4uF.801$oc6.177@fx10.fr7 Wed, 30   
   >> Oct 2019 00:15:56 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 29/10/2019 19:36, ~BD~ made a small mathematical error, now   
   >>> corrected .......   
   >>>   
   >>> *MY* electronics training was concluded *FIFTY* *FIVE* (55) years   
   >>> ago - but it *WAS* at   
   >>> the component level!   
   >>   
   >> So do you understand the circuit then, David?   
   >   
   > I doubt I would. I've not studied it either.   
      
   The fact you doubt you would isn't very encouraging, David. It isn't a   
   complicated design. I realize some of the components didn't exist in   
   their present form when you were trained, but your training should have   
   provided you with the ability to ascertain what such and such component   
   even though you don't know the characteristics of it is doing in the   
   circuit, based on identifying the components you do recognize along   
   with their wiring configuration in the circuit.   
      
   It's really no different than working on a PC or mac at the hardware   
   level. While each make/model might be slightly different from the   
   other, generally speaking, you can identify most of the components   
   present, even if they don't look the same between the machines.   
      
      
   --   
   Ain't No Woman Like the One-Eyed Gott.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)