Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.engineering.electrical    |    Electrical engineering discussion forum    |    2,547 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,336 of 2,547    |
|    The Natural Philosopher to Pancho    |
|    Re: OT Nuclear U-Boats; how do they cond    |
|    17 Sep 21 13:17:24    |
      XPost: uk.d-i-y       From: tnp@invalid.invalid              On 17/09/2021 12:43, Pancho wrote:       > On 17/09/2021 11:33, Steve Walker wrote:       >       >>       >> But subs hide much better. Time taken to arrive is not a problem for a       >> retaliatory weapon though.       >>       >       > Do they? With modern equipment. I actually suspect subs are more       > vulnerable to being taken out in a pre-emptive strike. I think the UK       > often has just one operational trident sub.       >       No, they are not.                     > Governments lie about the real reasons to placate the public.       "I think the UK often has just one operational trident sub."       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^       Governments lie about the real facts to placate the public.              >       > Most of the cash poor nuclear powers rely on mobile land nukes.              There are no cash poor nuclear powers.              You need to be pretty well heeled to build a bomb              Wiki:              Contents               1 Statistics and force configuration        2 Recognized nuclear-weapon states        2.1 United States        2.2 Russia (successor to the Soviet Union)        2.3 United Kingdom        2.4 France        2.5 China        3 States declaring possession of nuclear weapons        3.1 India        3.2 Pakistan        3.3 North Korea        4 States indicated to possess nuclear weapons        4.1 Israel        5 Launch authority        6 Nuclear weapons sharing        7 States formerly possessing nuclear weapons        7.1 South Africa        7.2 Former Soviet Republics              None of those are 'cash poor'       None of them lack at the very least a functional air force and some       missile capability                            Trains,       > lorries, multiple geographically distance launch sites. More weapons for       > your money. These are countries which are most likely to face a first       > strike.       >       You are making this up, completely. Talking out of your arse really.       >       >                     --       "I am inclined to tell the truth and dislike people who lie consistently.       This makes me unfit for the company of people of a Left persuasion, and       all women"              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca