XPost: sci.electronics.repair, 24hoursupport.helpdesk, alt.sport   
   .football.pro.sd-chargers   
      
   On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 21:23:06 -0700, UCLAN  wrote:   
      
   >On 4/20/2013 6:41 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:   
   >   
   >>> * At a time when reload times were measured in MINUTES, not milliseconds.   
   >>> * At a time when accuracy of muzzle-loading weapons was inferior to a   
   >>> bow and arrow.   
   >>   
   >> So, I take it that you believe the Freedom of Speech clause in the First   
   >> Amendment only applies to speaking from atop a soapbox at the local park   
   >> (no voice amplification), handwritten letters and documents/newspapers/   
   >> books printed using a screw press. It does not apply to radio, television,   
   >> modern high speed printing presses, the Internet or anything involving   
   >> amplification, electronics or any other technology developed since the   
   >> late 1700s?   
   >   
   >I'll assume from the above that you believe that assault weapons are   
   >protected by the Second Amendment.   
      
   Define "assault weapon".  (this ought to be good for a laugh)   
      
   > If so, where do you draw the line?   
      
   The line is pretty bright, should you care to actually take a few   
   moments to educate yourself rather than spout the typical leftist   
   nonsense.   
      
   >Bazookas? Grenade launchers? A tank parked in my front yard?   
      
   Again, you show your complete ignorance of the subject which you rant   
   on about.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)