From: DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org   
      
   On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 12:02:08 -0700, UCLAN  wrote:   
      
   >On 4/21/2013 8:36 AM, Michael Moroney wrote:   
   >   
   >>> I'll assume from the above that you believe that assault weapons are   
   >>> protected by the Second Amendment. If so, where do you draw the line?   
   >>> Bazookas? Grenade launchers? A tank parked in my front yard?   
   >>   
   >> Depends on your definition of "assault weapons".  Do you mean what the   
   >> military and gun industry calls "assault weapons"? Or what the media and   
   >> anti-gun activists call "assault weapons"?   
   >   
   >Nice evasion tactic. I'll repeat the pertinent part of the question.   
   >   
   >"If so, where do you draw the line? Bazookas? Grenade launchers? A tank   
   >parked in my front yard?   
      
      
     Perfectly legal to have.   
      
     The thing is what define their legal use as a defensive device?   
      
     THAT element would be and is very limited.  Which is why you do not see   
   folks utilizing the as defensive devices much.   
      
     You can bet that CRIMINALS, however, Do have things like LARS rockets,   
   and WOULD use them, and likely will when and if we come knocking on their   
   doors to find them.   
      
     Right?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)