Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.engineering.electrical    |    Electrical engineering discussion forum    |    2,547 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 829 of 2,547    |
|    Jamie to Bob E.    |
|    Re: Mains wiring question: flush vs. sur    |
|    13 May 13 23:04:41    |
      XPost: sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.equipment       From: jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net              Bob E. wrote:              >>run wire between the studs under the sheet rock from a knock out of the       >>subpanel up to the joist and down the wall under the rock where the       >>charger will be, even though in some places it is acceptable to bore       >>holes no more than a specific side in the studs to pass wire       >>horizontally, I would wouldn't recommend it. If you do decide on       >>this, use rigid with feed through stud supports that can be mounted.       >>       >> THe charger should have knock outs on the back panel inside for the       >>power entrance. Most people in this case use a rung of romix. You       >>simply surface mount the charger with the entrance poking through inside.       >>       >> I always thought a charger was an appliance and should have a       >>rubber cord with cap to a surface or recessed receptacle.       >> Jamie       >       >       > The 100A circuit needed by the charger (the actual charger is in the vehicle       > -- this is really just a connector to the structure's 240 ac mains) requires       > 3 awg copper wire (4 awg ground). Some kind of conduit required, probably       > 1.25 inch. Romex not an option.       >       > Under the 'rock is difficult: water heater & furnace are between the panel       > and the charge station proposed location. Enough clearance over the 'rock but       > going "sub" requires much frustration, if possible.       >       > What's a "feed through stud support"? (Googling this gets hits relating to       > threaded electrical stud, not a 2x4...)       >       > Still think that surface mount except for the last 18 inches then going "sub"       > is the best option.       >       > These cars are 85 KWh capacities. Think "SLA charger times 10."       >       > Thanks.       >       Electrical Stud bushings.              Jamie              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca