XPost: alt.support.boy-lovers, alt.support.incest, rec.nude   
   XPost: alt.anytown, alt.fan.goons, alt.support.crossposting   
   From: 4s00th@hushmail.com   
      
   On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:08:20 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 10:18:55 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>   
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:41:46 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:22:19 GMT, "TomBa ++"   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>Brandon D Cartwright  wrote in   
   >>>>news:uge4i3t5i4o5usqig24tp19kc7l2q0u5kt@4ax.com:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>You are off topic and will be reported to google groups   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Oh, so I guess you won't mind when alt.support.suicide, rec.nude,   
   >>>>>>alt.anytown and alt.fan.goons reports YOU to GooGoo for being   
   >>>>>>off-topic in those groups?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Off-topic?   
   >>>>> What are you babbling about.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Steve Walz &  David Simpson's sick activities are on topic in any   
   >>>>> group they infest,no matter how many pedophiles support them .   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>Would these posters be in the several groups if not for your and your   
   >>>>master's rampant x-posting? ou seem to believe that your x-posting is a   
   >>>>means that justifies the ends (as you are wont to define the terms).   
   >>>   
   >>>As I should being a regular in alt.support.crossposting.   
   >>>   
   >>>They are both regulars in alt.support.incest. in their own right as   
   >>>firm believers in children's' *rights* to be fucked by their parents.   
   >>>   
   >>>Indeed they claim any parent who doesn't fuck their child is guilty of   
   >>>child abuse, and in walz's view deserves to be killed.   
   >>>   
   >>>>I think YOU are off topic wherever you raise your ugly head...   
   >>>   
   >>>Ugly is as ugly does kiddie fucker.   
   >>   
   >>As I have said elsewhere, if you decide that you are going to use any   
   >>means whatsoever in your "crusade," then you had better be prepared to   
   >>accept it when people call you on your horrid behavior.   
   >   
   >Still in denial about Walz and Simpson and their incitements to   
   >incestuous pedophilia   
   >   
   >Now you go into denial about Tomba the sex predator, while you   
   >download his pictures of naked children.   
   >   
   >And you have  the barefaced audacity to call my mentioning this   
   > elephant in the bedroom horrid!   
   >   
   Well, if you'd just provide this wealth of evidence you claim exists,   
   then it would all be settled, wouldn't it?   
      
   You've got no one to blame but yourself. If you're going to go around   
   making stuff up about people you ought to at least try to find some   
   kind of evidence to back it up.   
      
   If you think it's okay to accuse people of crimes which you cannot   
   prove, if you think it's okay to cross-post your ignorance from here   
   to hell without caring that you are posting off-topic in groups, then   
   you better get used to being called a lying troll.   
      
   You convinced me about Walz being unstable, fine. Didn't take much,   
   did it? Just a little evidence to back up your claims. But since   
   you're not providing shit about these claims AND I know you've lied   
   about ME in the past, why should I think you're doing anything but   
   lying again?   
      
   Not only that, you have the nerve to point to the bo0b's post as if   
   they actually mattered. I've seen what he's posted about me --   
   encouraging people to kill -- specifically ME, taking my words out of   
   context and then claiming that they mean things that they quite   
   obviously do not, accusing me of doing things I've not done -- why   
   should I think he's doing any different with anyone else? And I've   
   seen you both claim that David is "defending the indefensible" when   
   he's only stating facts.   
      
   Now, you can keep making your accusations without providing any of the   
   evidence that you claim is abundant on Usenet and mark yourself as a   
   liar, or you can put your money where your mouth is and provide the   
   evidence that I've been asking for for over a week now, or you can   
   shut the fuck up. Your choice.   
      
   And, FTR, I've never seen Tomba post pictures. Now, maybe I have a bad   
   memory -- it's been over ten years since I began reading and posting   
   on Usenet, or maybe he's posting them in some group I don't know   
   about, but unless you can prove that claim -- then you need to shut up   
   about it as well. And, even if he is posting pictures of naked   
   children -- that's not against the law so long as the pictures do not   
   meet the definition of pornography.   
      
   You need to either put out or shut up. It's been over a week now.   
      
   -- 4s00th@hushmail.com   
      
   If you send email, I will reply to it here at asbl   
   (without showing your email addy)   
   unless you ask me not to.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)