XPost: alt.support.boy-lovers, alt.support.incest, rec.nude   
   XPost: alt.anytown, alt.fan.goons   
   From: user@example.net   
      
   On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:39:23 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>   
   wrote:   
      
   >On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:50:31 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 10:18:55 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>   
   >>wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:24:34 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:45:48 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>   
   >>>>wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:08:16 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright   
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:52:18 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>   
   >>>>>>wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:41:47 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright   
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:08:27 GMT, "nemo"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>"Branston D Pickle"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>news:64p1i3h4rchunkcutoutjv72hbjt@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> s400th tries to make a big deal out of  my critique of his slanders   
   of   
   >>>>>>>>>> boband carole's war record.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Boband??   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>bobandcarole.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Yet he doesn't see any problem in supporting the ravings of   
   >>>>>>>>>> the criminally insane sex pervert Steve Walz   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>What about Fred Foxtrot?! That's what I say!! Or Barney Beguine or   
   Sammy   
   >>>>>>>>>Samba!!   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>If they are not fucking children they have no problem.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>I mean - fair doos!!   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Fair doos?? Usually means sumfing wrong with yer liver!   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>You are off topic and will be reported to google groups   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Oh, so I guess you won't mind when alt.support.suicide, rec.nude,   
   >>>>>>>alt.anytown and alt.fan.goons reports YOU to GooGoo for being   
   >>>>>>>off-topic in those groups?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Off-topic?   
   >>>>>>What are you babbling about.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Steve Walz &  David Simpson's sick activities are on topic in any   
   >>>>>>group they infest,no matter how many pedophiles support them .   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Only in the sick world where you believe that any means is justified   
   >>>>>by your imaginary crusade.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>The world of pedophiles is indeed a sick world and despite your   
   >>>>friends' insistence that pedophiles are imaginary, their activities   
   >>>>have real victims and very real consequences.   
   >>>   
   >>>Let me explain this to you 1 more time:   
   >>>   
   >>>a pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to children, someone   
   >>>who has feelings and desires; by definition, that does not indicate   
   >>>that a pedophile will or will not act on those desires to harm anyone   
   >>>else   
   >>>   
   >>>Pedophilia is the condition of having sexual attraction to children.   
   >>>Again, it does not require that one act on such feelings, just that   
   >>>one has them.   
   >>>   
   >>>The fact that one has feelings -- regardless of what those feelings   
   >>>are -- does not indicate anything wrong; feelings are neither right or   
   >>>wrong, they simply are. Behavior, on the other hand, can be right or   
   >>>wrong, and it is only behavior that we judge. No matter what feelings   
   >>>a person has -- and you seem to have no problems with someone   
   >>>suggesting that I and others here ought to be killed -- the only thing   
   >>>you can truly judge is the way that they behave.   
   >>>   
   >>>Your war is not on pedophilia or pedophiles -- it is on   
   >>>child-molesters. And I'd like to point out that while child-molesters   
   >>>may attack children, that doesn't mean that they actually are   
   >>>attracted to children -- some of them get off on dominating anyone   
   >>>weaker than themselves, and that makes children a natural target. And   
   >>>yes, many child-molesters are pedophiles -- but that does not mean   
   >>>that ALL or even MOST pedophiles are child-molesters.   
   >>   
   >>From: 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>   
   >>Message-ID:    
   >>   
   >>"And I'd also like to point out that 90% of convicted child-molesters   
   >>are so-called situational pedophiles".   
   >   
   >   
   >And your point would be .... ?   
      
      
   That even by your own convoluted, Jesuitical definitions the   
   difference between a pedophile and a child molester is more apparent   
   than real of course.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)