XPost: alt.atheism, alt.transgendered, soc.support.transgendered
XPost: alt.support.depression, alt.culture.internet
From: science@danwin1210.de
On 2/13/22 21:45, KWills wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 20:34:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/11/22 17:46, KWills wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:39:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/10/22 5:59 PM, KWills wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:16:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/10/22 4:10 PM, KWills wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 07:06:59 -0700, % wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-10 6:37 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/8/22 8:54 PM, KWills wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 20:22:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/5/22 9:35 PM, Fred OInka wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 21:26:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/5/22 9:12 PM, Fred OInka wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 20:21:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/5/22 7:37 PM, KWills wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 16:20:00 +0000, Scientific (he/him) ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 8:15 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 1:13 p.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:45 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:32 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/22 6:22 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-02-04 11:11 a.m., Scientific (he/him) ? wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please block messages and report the shit out of fake %
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impersonator.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good idea
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are one of few people who aren't transphobic on
Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only because i don't care
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lucky to see that you don't label people by their gender.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why bother i'm not going to be intimate with them no matter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what they are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> KWills is a bigot, just like your fake impersonator is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am not a bigot. I simply expose delusional gender
appropriators
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like you for what you are.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Calling trans people "delusional gender appropriators" is not a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good way
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to win our trust.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would we want that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you a trans person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am a man, I was born that way and no matter what I say or do I
will
>>>>>>>>>>>> always be a man.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Then be a cis man, nobody is forcing you to be trans.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There's no such thing as a 'cis' man and nobody has ever
successfully
>>>>>>>>>> managed to 'trans'. Nobody is forcing you to harbour your
delusions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> HTH
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, you're a cis person (or at least a trans person that passes as
cis).
>>>>>>>>> A lot of people have transitioned successfully.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> notice no one elses judges peoples sex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Judging people's sex is pointless. It is what it is. It's a FACT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So is judging by their gender.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's simply an incorrect word for 'sex'. There is only one M/F
>>>>> distinction and that's sex.
>>>>
>>>> There's also gender identity - which gender they identify as.
>>>
>>> No, there isn't. There's no NEED for you to 'identify' as any
>>> 'gender'. It's meaningless. Your DNA has already done that job for
>>> you.
>>>
>>>> You cannot
>>>> prove who you are, including gender identity
>>>
>>> Of course not, because it's all delusional.
>>
>> You cannot prove that you're KWills, either.
>
> Of course I can't, because I'm not.
>
>>>> , but at least there is
>>>> overwhelming research supporting current model of transgender care.
>>>
>>> And it's all delusional woke horseshit.
>>
>> No, current gender-affirming model of care is a result of the scientific
>> method. You can pick only those interventions you want to affirm your
>> gender identity. You aren't pushed to do anything, you are allowed to
>> pick what you want.
>
> The only 'scientific method' you need is DNA. Everything else in your
> gender appropriating handbook is horseshit.
>
>> Don't get a penectomy if you aren't 101% sure. A gender therapist will
>> assess you and say you 'no' to penectomy for you.
>
> Therefore you yourself aren't 101% sure. Wake up, smell the coffee,
> and resume living as a man.
>
>>>>>> Transgender people can be just about everything
>>>>>
>>>>> Except for the fact that none such actually exist.
>>>>>
>>>>>> , beginning from trans women up to unique gender identities so
>>>>>> one but those people themselves can understand it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Woke delusions. How many of these 'gender identities' have you wackos
>>>>> come up with? I last heard over a hundred.
>>>>
>>>> There are as many gender identities as there are people in the world -
>>>> except people who don't expreience it, and that's vaild too!
>>>
>>> But the only thing that matters is what sex someone is, and there are
>>> only two possibilities. The rest is, again, woke horseshit.
>>
>> What about about intersex people?
>
> There are a small number of deformed freaks of nature, but less than
> 0.0000000000000000001% of delusional 'transgenders' fall into this
> category.
That equals 0 (zero) trans people.
> --
> KWills
> Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
> counselor.
> https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
> All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
