XPost: alt.support.boy-lovers, alt.hackers.malicious, alt.support.incest
XPost: rec.nude, alt.anytown, alt.fan.goons
From: user@example.net
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:49:44 GMT, "wonderer"
wrote:
>
>"Brandon D Cartwright" wrote in message
>news:4vq1i39vts9a41cpqo5n2p23brp0oqqqee@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:16:14 +0930, David
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:25:56 GMT, "TomBa ++"
>>> typed furiously:
>>>
>>>>friendly face wrote in
>>>>news:Xns99D298F91DA63gasolineandbile@66.250.146.159:
>>>>
>>>>> Brandon D Cartwright wrote in
>>>>> news:gcglh3dsdr74hbn9bddofdgm973ujnphnu@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 02:14:36 GMT, "TomBa ++"
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Brandon D Cartwright wrote in
>>>>>>>news:kjckh3l4sp0epd0g2f9p9179hq9btg5ll4@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:53:32 +0930, David
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:09:06 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:39:23 +0930, David
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:39:28 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>>>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:55:41 +0930, David
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 19 Oct 2007 03:42:43 GMT, friendly face
>>>>>>>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>David wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:e9jeh3pf52gmrtagtecnt5pe0o3isk95r3@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:52:22 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:46:34 +0930, David
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:48:45 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:00:28 GMT, "TomBa ++"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ThePsyko wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:Xns99CB4011E7259LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 Oct 2007 I stormed the castle called
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.support.boy-lovers and heard TomBa ++ cry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out in news:Xns99CAD28C07B29fort1234@140.99.99.130...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ThePsyko wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:Xns99CAA554EB408LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 Oct 2007 I stormed the castle called
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.support.boy-lovers and heard TomBa ++ cry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out in news:Xns99CAA467CE60Ffort1234@140.99.99.130...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brandon D Cartwright wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:9bn4h3hiheddbpt4m2b4jgulfcgml70qsq@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>perhaps we would agree better if i acknowledge you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>weren't over-doing in posting the site, but you do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>lose faith by associating yourself with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>bobandcarole.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any critic of these predatory pedophiles and their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> online child pornography rings will be slandered.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you believe that slander is an effective means
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of winning an argument?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you believe that those you attack are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "predatory pedophiles" and engaging in "child
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pornography rings?" (Hint: both assumptions are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> false.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are they? Can you say that with absolute certainty?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I can't make such a broad statement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ummm... but you did?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Uhmm... yes it would appear so. I was more objecting to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Brandon's all inclusive characterizations in labelling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*any* of his targets of slander as predators and porn ring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>members. I know from personal experiences that *I* do not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fit into either of these categories, yet I'm a target of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>his slanders.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Just who do you think you are fooling?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well we know that you are making a fool of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well clearly he has fooled you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But as you advocate for the legalization of incest and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"consenting " sex even with six year olds its no great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>surprise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kindly cite evidence that I have advocated _any_ kind of sex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with six-year-olds. I have never done so. You are a liar as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well as a fool.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>helloooo, brandon! how dare you accuse him of advocating sex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>with six year olds?! twelve year olds are TWICE as mature!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Exactly, but they are illegal in my neck of the woods so it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>definitely look but do not touch. I have never advocated sex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>with anyone under the age of consent. Brandon is merely taking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bo0by's allegations and adding an age to them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>He is the one who first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>mentioned the age of six.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Actually it was your ideological comrade-in-arms Steve Walz.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Regardless, I have never advocated sex with anyone under the age
>>>>>>>>>>>of consent.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>You seem to have memory problems.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Oh well..the point is you claimed that children *can* consent.
>>>>>>>>>>If you are now saying that you realize that adults having sex with
>>>>>>>>>>children is abusing them then that is progress.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Claiming that children can and do consent has nothing to do with
>>>>>>>>>abuse. If the child has sex with the adult, rather than the adult
>>>>>>>>>having sex with the child, is that still abuse? If so is it the
>>>>>>>>>adult who is being abused.
>>>>>
>>>>> if a ten-year-old budding sociopath digs his poppa's gun out of the far
>>>>> reaches of the closet, retrieves the ammo from the tool box in the
>>>>shed,
>>>>> and then procedes to load the gun one sunday morning before church,
>>>>hold
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
