XPost: alt.support.boy-lovers, alt.hackers.malicious, alt.support.incest
XPost: rec.nude, alt.anytown, alt.fan.goons
From: user@example.net
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:41:30 GMT, "wonderer"
wrote:
>
>"Brandon D Cartwright" wrote in message
>news:v233i3d3l07lvdq9j3n9pcnrateh1a7pbh@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:49:44 GMT, "wonderer"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Brandon D Cartwright" wrote in message
>>>news:4vq1i39vts9a41cpqo5n2p23brp0oqqqee@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:16:14 +0930, David
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:25:56 GMT, "TomBa ++"
>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>
>>>>>>friendly face wrote in
>>>>>>news:Xns99D298F91DA63gasolineandbile@66.250.146.159:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Brandon D Cartwright wrote in
>>>>>>> news:gcglh3dsdr74hbn9bddofdgm973ujnphnu@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 02:14:36 GMT, "TomBa ++"
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Brandon D Cartwright wrote in
>>>>>>>>>news:kjckh3l4sp0epd0g2f9p9179hq9btg5ll4@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:53:32 +0930, David
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:09:06 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>>>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:39:23 +0930, David
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:39:28 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>>>>>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:55:41 +0930, David
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 19 Oct 2007 03:42:43 GMT, friendly face
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>David wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:e9jeh3pf52gmrtagtecnt5pe0o3isk95r3@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:52:22 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:46:34 +0930, David
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:48:45 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:00:28 GMT, "TomBa ++"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ThePsyko wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:Xns99CB4011E7259LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 Oct 2007 I stormed the castle called
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.support.boy-lovers and heard TomBa ++ cry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out in news:Xns99CAD28C07B29fort1234@140.99.99.130...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ThePsyko wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:Xns99CAA554EB408LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 Oct 2007 I stormed the castle called
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.support.boy-lovers and heard TomBa ++
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:Xns99CAA467CE60Ffort1234@140.99.99.130...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brandon D Cartwright wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:9bn4h3hiheddbpt4m2b4jgulfcgml70qsq@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>perhaps we would agree better if i acknowledge you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>weren't over-doing in posting the site, but you do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>lose faith by associating yourself with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>bobandcarole.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any critic of these predatory pedophiles and their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> online child pornography rings will be slandered.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you believe that slander is an effective
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> means
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of winning an argument?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you believe that those you attack are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "predatory pedophiles" and engaging in "child
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pornography rings?" (Hint: both assumptions are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> false.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are they? Can you say that with absolute certainty?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I can't make such a broad statement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ummm... but you did?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Uhmm... yes it would appear so. I was more objecting to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Brandon's all inclusive characterizations in labelling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*any* of his targets of slander as predators and porn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>members. I know from personal experiences that *I* do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fit into either of these categories, yet I'm a target of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>his slanders.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Just who do you think you are fooling?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well we know that you are making a fool of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well clearly he has fooled you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But as you advocate for the legalization of incest and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"consenting " sex even with six year olds its no great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>surprise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kindly cite evidence that I have advocated _any_ kind of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with six-year-olds. I have never done so. You are a liar as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well as a fool.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>helloooo, brandon! how dare you accuse him of advocating sex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>with six year olds?! twelve year olds are TWICE as mature!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Exactly, but they are illegal in my neck of the woods so it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>definitely look but do not touch. I have never advocated sex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>with anyone under the age of consent. Brandon is merely taking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bo0by's allegations and adding an age to them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>He is the one who first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>mentioned the age of six.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Actually it was your ideological comrade-in-arms Steve Walz.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Regardless, I have never advocated sex with anyone under the age
>>>>>>>>>>>>>of consent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>You seem to have memory problems.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh well..the point is you claimed that children *can* consent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>If you are now saying that you realize that adults having sex
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
