XPost: alt.support.boy-lovers, alt.support.incest, rec.nude
XPost: alt.anytown, alt.fan.goons
From: user@example.net
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 10:18:55 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>
wrote:
>On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:24:34 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:45:48 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:08:16 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:52:18 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:41:47 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:08:27 GMT, "nemo" wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Branston D Pickle" wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:64p1i3h4rchunkcutoutjv72hbjt@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> s400th tries to make a big deal out of my critique of his slanders of
>>>>>>>> boband carole's war record.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Boband??
>>>>>>
>>>>>>bobandcarole.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yet he doesn't see any problem in supporting the ravings of
>>>>>>>> the criminally insane sex pervert Steve Walz
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What about Fred Foxtrot?! That's what I say!! Or Barney Beguine or Sammy
>>>>>>>Samba!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If they are not fucking children they have no problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I mean - fair doos!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Fair doos?? Usually means sumfing wrong with yer liver!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You are off topic and will be reported to google groups
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh, so I guess you won't mind when alt.support.suicide, rec.nude,
>>>>>alt.anytown and alt.fan.goons reports YOU to GooGoo for being
>>>>>off-topic in those groups?
>>>>
>>>>Off-topic?
>>>>What are you babbling about.
>>>>
>>>>Steve Walz & David Simpson's sick activities are on topic in any
>>>>group they infest,no matter how many pedophiles support them .
>>>
>>>Only in the sick world where you believe that any means is justified
>>>by your imaginary crusade.
>>
>>The world of pedophiles is indeed a sick world and despite your
>>friends' insistence that pedophiles are imaginary, their activities
>>have real victims and very real consequences.
>
>Let me explain this to you 1 more time:
>
>a pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to children, someone
>who has feelings and desires; by definition, that does not indicate
>that a pedophile will or will not act on those desires to harm anyone
>else
>
>Pedophilia is the condition of having sexual attraction to children.
>Again, it does not require that one act on such feelings, just that
>one has them.
>
>The fact that one has feelings -- regardless of what those feelings
>are -- does not indicate anything wrong; feelings are neither right or
>wrong, they simply are. Behavior, on the other hand, can be right or
>wrong, and it is only behavior that we judge. No matter what feelings
>a person has -- and you seem to have no problems with someone
>suggesting that I and others here ought to be killed -- the only thing
>you can truly judge is the way that they behave.
>
>Your war is not on pedophilia or pedophiles -- it is on
>child-molesters. And I'd like to point out that while child-molesters
>may attack children, that doesn't mean that they actually are
>attracted to children -- some of them get off on dominating anyone
>weaker than themselves, and that makes children a natural target. And
>yes, many child-molesters are pedophiles -- but that does not mean
>that ALL or even MOST pedophiles are child-molesters.
From: 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com>
!
Message-ID:
"And I'd also like to point out that 90% of convicted child-molesters
are so-called situational pedophiles".
>
>If you are going to declare some kind of war or crusade, you really
>ought to know who or what you are fighting.
>
>And if you decide that you do not care what methods you use in your
>crusade, then you had better be prepared to be called for your own bad
>behavior.
>
>-- 4s00th@hushmail.com
>
>If you send email, I will reply to it here at asbl
>(without showing your email addy)
>unless you ask me not to.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
