XPost: alt.support.boy-lovers, alt.support.incest, rec.nude
XPost: alt.anytown, alt.fan.goons
From: user@example.net
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:54:40 +1030, David
wrote:
>On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:39:23 -0400, 4s00th <4s00th@hushmail.com> typed
>furiously:
>
>>I'm serving you notice now. Provide your proof. I've already promised
>>to give it a fair hearing -- I can't do better than that. I've already
>>agreed that you proved your point about Walz -- and it wasn't even YOU
>>who provided most of that proof!
>>
>>So, I'm asking you 1 final time, provide your proof that David has
>>ever endorsed incest or supported sex between adults and children
>>other than the suggestion that the age of consent is too high. Oh, and
>>keep in mind that I've already said that I don't care if adults want
>>to carry on incestuous affairs amongst themselves -- that's their
>>business as far as I'm concerned.
>>
>I too would love to see this proof. I have never endorsed the breaking
>of any laws, instead I advocate that the laws be changed to reflect
>the age of puberty rather than some arbitrary number which, in my
>opinion, is way too high in many cases. I also advocate the education
>of children in all aspects of sex and sexuality from an early age.
>
>Like 4sooth I do not believe that incestuous affairs between adults
>are any concern of either the law or anyone other than the persons
>concerned. The law states otherwise and it should be changed.
An adult having sex with a child is doing the child a favor if the
child enjoys it.
The damage done to a child fucked by it's parents is caused by the
social workers and the LEA if the child enjoys it.
*NOT* to fuck your own or any other child who wants it is child
abuse and a product of religious brainwashing.
The day is coming when incest and pedophilia will be legalized.
You have asserted all these things and s400th is well aware of it.
Are you now recanting?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
