XPost: alt.support.boy-lovers, alt.hackers.malicious, alt.support.incest
XPost: rec.nude, alt.anytown, alt.fan.goons
From: user@example.net
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:16:14 +0930, David
wrote:
>On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:25:56 GMT, "TomBa ++"
> typed furiously:
>
>>friendly face wrote in
>>news:Xns99D298F91DA63gasolineandbile@66.250.146.159:
>>
>>> Brandon D Cartwright wrote in
>>> news:gcglh3dsdr74hbn9bddofdgm973ujnphnu@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 02:14:36 GMT, "TomBa ++"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Brandon D Cartwright wrote in
>>>>>news:kjckh3l4sp0epd0g2f9p9179hq9btg5ll4@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:53:32 +0930, David
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:09:06 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:39:23 +0930, David
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:39:28 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:55:41 +0930, David
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On 19 Oct 2007 03:42:43 GMT, friendly face
>>>>>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>David wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>news:e9jeh3pf52gmrtagtecnt5pe0o3isk95r3@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:52:22 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>>>>>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:46:34 +0930, David
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:48:45 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typed furiously:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:00:28 GMT, "TomBa ++"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ThePsyko wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:Xns99CB4011E7259LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 Oct 2007 I stormed the castle called
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.support.boy-lovers and heard TomBa ++ cry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out in news:Xns99CAD28C07B29fort1234@140.99.99.130...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ThePsyko wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:Xns99CAA554EB408LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 Oct 2007 I stormed the castle called
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.support.boy-lovers and heard TomBa ++ cry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out in news:Xns99CAA467CE60Ffort1234@140.99.99.130...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brandon D Cartwright wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:9bn4h3hiheddbpt4m2b4jgulfcgml70qsq@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>perhaps we would agree better if i acknowledge you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>weren't over-doing in posting the site, but you do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>lose faith by associating yourself with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>bobandcarole.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any critic of these predatory pedophiles and their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> online child pornography rings will be slandered.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you believe that slander is an effective means
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of winning an argument?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you believe that those you attack are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "predatory pedophiles" and engaging in "child
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pornography rings?" (Hint: both assumptions are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> false.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are they? Can you say that with absolute certainty?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I can't make such a broad statement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ummm... but you did?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Uhmm... yes it would appear so. I was more objecting to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Brandon's all inclusive characterizations in labelling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*any* of his targets of slander as predators and porn ring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>members. I know from personal experiences that *I* do not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fit into either of these categories, yet I'm a target of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>his slanders.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Just who do you think you are fooling?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well we know that you are making a fool of yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well clearly he has fooled you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But as you advocate for the legalization of incest and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"consenting " sex even with six year olds its no great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>surprise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kindly cite evidence that I have advocated _any_ kind of sex
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with six-year-olds. I have never done so. You are a liar as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> well as a fool.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>helloooo, brandon! how dare you accuse him of advocating sex
>>>>>>>>>>>>with six year olds?! twelve year olds are TWICE as mature!!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Exactly, but they are illegal in my neck of the woods so it is
>>>>>>>>>>>definitely look but do not touch. I have never advocated sex
>>>>>>>>>>>with anyone under the age of consent. Brandon is merely taking
>>>>>>>>>>>Bo0by's allegations and adding an age to them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>He is the one who first
>>>>>>>>>>>mentioned the age of six.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Actually it was your ideological comrade-in-arms Steve Walz.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Regardless, I have never advocated sex with anyone under the age
>>>>>>>>>of consent.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You seem to have memory problems.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Oh well..the point is you claimed that children *can* consent.
>>>>>>>>If you are now saying that you realize that adults having sex with
>>>>>>>>children is abusing them then that is progress.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Claiming that children can and do consent has nothing to do with
>>>>>>>abuse. If the child has sex with the adult, rather than the adult
>>>>>>>having sex with the child, is that still abuse? If so is it the
>>>>>>>adult who is being abused.
>>>
>>> if a ten-year-old budding sociopath digs his poppa's gun out of the far
>>> reaches of the closet, retrieves the ammo from the tool box in the
>>shed,
>>> and then procedes to load the gun one sunday morning before church,
>>hold
>>> it to his mother's head, and fucks her in the ass, then yes, it is the
>>> adult who is being abused.
>>>
>>> if an 11 year old asks her dad for help with her homework, then drops
>>> her pencil on the floor for an excuse to kneel between his legs and
>>suck
>>> the chrome off his trailer hitch, he will either be deeply disturbed
>>for
>>> a very long time (like abuse victims are) before he pulls her away and
>>> gets her into therapy, or he will grab her pigtails and deep throat her
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
