XPost: alt.society.sovereign, alt.society.anarchy, alt.society.revolution   
   XPost: alt.anarchism, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa.misc, alt.politics.reform   
   From: tributyltinpint@yahoo.co.uk   
      
   David Johnston wrote:   
   >   
   > On Sun, 31 May 2009 19:01:15 GMT, arkent3@earthlink.net (Raymond   
   > Karczewski) wrote:   
   >   
   > >Demand the Court Follow their Own Law and  PROVE JURISDICTION over Ed   
   > >and Elaine Brown Before making a further Mockery of Justice in   
   > >America.   
   > >   
   > >                        By Raymond Ronald Karczewski©   
   > >   
   > >Existing Case law states:  "Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must   
   > >be proven." HAGENS vs LAVINE,  15 U.S. 533 "No sanctions can be   
   > >imposed absent proof of jurisdiction."   
   >   
   > Simply being within the geographic bounds of the United States is   
   > sufficient proof of the jurisdiction of American courts.   
   >   
   Rayronkar is claiming that no courts have any jurisdiction, I think   
   that's what he's going on about. Of course they do. Not *all*   
   courts have jurisdiction for everything, of course.   
      
      
      
   --   
   "Oh, I'm broke."   
   "Take another mortgage, don't give in."   
   "I thought you were broke. Where did you get all that money from?"   
   "Don't question me."   
   "Where did you get it?"   
   "I borrowed it from the bank."   
   "Well, you can't do that, that's cheating."   
   "Listen you little stoat, I own Park Lane, I can borrow as much   
   bloody money as I like."   
   ~Joanna Lumley and Julia Sawalha, "Absolutely Fabulous"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)