7f4242e5   
   XPost: alt.radio.talk.dr-laura, seattle.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: alt.california, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.republicans   
   XPost: alt.impeach.bush, alt.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism   
   XPost: alt.politics.liberalism, alt.culture.alaska, tx.politics   
   From: lickit@Bushies.net   
      
   "Editor RadioTalkingPoints"  wrote   
   in message   
   news:55d42c37-f830-40b6-8929-a5e4bba3cc33@y10g2000prg.googlegroups.com...   
   On Oct 19, 5:28 am, "GW Bastard Sr."  wrote:   
   > Just so that I can get this straight.   
   >   
   > 1. It's OK for any conservative politician/administration to call out the   
   > news media.   
   >   
   > 2. It's not OK for a liberal/democratic politician or administration to   
   > call   
   > out the news media.   
   >   
   > I see, once again, IOKIYAR. I get it now. And the thing is, when   
   > conservatives criticize, normally it's because the media are putting out   
   > negative stories, not un-true stories, but, negative stories. In the case   
   > of   
   > the Obama administration, it's straight up falsehoods, lies, and   
   > misinformation from FoxNews pretty much 24/7 against Obama.   
   >   
   > Sure, why shouldn't they fight back against the lies and misinformation?   
   >   
   > Amazing. I never saw (and if they're out there, I'd love to read them)   
   > media   
   > outlets, and journalists criticizing say, the Bush administration for them   
   > haranguing the media. I'm pretty sure, it never happened. How about   
   > someone   
   > calling out Palin for criticizing the media? Probably never happened   
   > either.   
   >   
   > And, like I said all along, if Obama has been "lying" so much, then the   
   > media (FoxNews in this case) should have an easy time doing stories about   
   > him, instead of making things up about him   
      
   Nobody in the Bush administration was talking about shutting down the   
   internet for a "fair and balanced" playing field, or the advertising   
   industry?  In my opinion, the Bush family did not defend themselves   
   against some really negative opinions they did not deserve, and that   
   has only created a dark cloud over America, created by Americans?   
      
   Did the Bush family surround themselves with people with the   
   strangest, most revolting viewpoints that they tout as "exceptional"   
   in their eyes, and expect us to be blind?  Regarding   
   Fox News, they have not had to retract anything as a lie?   
      
   The first sign that your post was based on quicksand was your   
   reference to the Bush administration?  Have you figured out that your   
   guy won, or is that what you beginning to understand now?   
      
   Resistance if futile, you must comply, with the truth........   
      
   Can you smell el el el el el el el what the Rock of Truth, the man   
   with the greatest eyebrow known to man, with the whitest teeth in the   
   universe, is cooking?   
      
   Being that this the most exciting, most entertaining, fact finding,   
   brain busting, fun loving,   
   liberal egg shell mind crunching, invincible smacketh downeth erectus   
   amongus, you can't see the truth coming, but you know it is anyway,   
   sonic boom of Conservatism, most powerful keyboard in the world,   
      
   Do you feel ............lucky?   
      
   Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct   
   10th, 2009   
      
   a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all   
   electronic forms of communication are not representative of   
   advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the   
   messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own   
   risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to   
   transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,   
   including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function   
   of the website, and may or may not be archived. No personal   
   information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided   
   to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,   
   or, individuals concerned.   
      
   b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in   
   various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to   
   any third parties to share or provide private personal information who   
   may operate as part of the internet communications system, including   
   all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the   
   nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and   
   physical control, unless those communications represent violations of   
   the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to   
   pursue any legal remedies.   
      
   c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain   
   factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views   
   may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called   
   a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,   
   grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or   
   imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing   
   information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment   
   purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on the actions,   
   character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of   
   individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of   
   people, and not the general public, however no distribution   
   restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright   
   Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all   
   commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to   
   remain the sole possesion of the original author.   
      
   d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be   
   designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse   
   examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas   
   that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven   
   to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage   
   or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal   
   manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the   
   author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with   
   no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,   
   transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free   
   speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that   
   believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and   
   other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of   
   abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the   
   wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not   
   condone).   
      
   e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)