XPost: alt.politics.conservative, soc.culture.kenya, alt.anarchism   
   XPost: alt.retribution   
   From: hdr22@clintonfoundation.org   
      
   In article    
   Peter J Ross  wrote:   
   >   
   > By Richard Edmonds   
   >   
   > The facts on the "Holocaust" have been exposed years ago in a   
   > trial in Toronto, Canada. The defendant in the dock was the   
   > German-Canadian, Ernst Zundel, accused by the State prosecutor of   
   > disputing the claim that during the Second World War the Germans had   
   > murdered millions of Jews in purpose-built gas-chambers.   
   >   
   > This trial, held in 1985 against Ernst Zundel, is of greatest   
   > importance due to the evidence given at the court by an expert   
   > witness. Professor Raul Hilberg of the University of Vermont, USA,   
   > was recognized by the court to be the world expert on the alleged   
   > "Holocaust". In open court and under oath, Professor Hilberg stated   
   > that he knew of no independent, forensic scientific for the existence   
   > anywhere of a gas-chamber, planned built and operated by the Germans   
   > during the Second World War for the purpose of killing, murdering or   
   > executing Jews or any other persons. Professor Hilberg further stated   
   > that with regard to causes of death in the whole extent of   
   > German-occupied Europe during the Second World War, he was unable to   
   > supply the court with a single autopsy certificate, stating the cause   
   > of death of a single individual to be due to poisoning by cyanide gas.   
   > Cyanide gas was the highly toxic gas allegedly used in the alleged   
   > German gas-chambers.   
   >   
   > The origin of the "Holocaust" allegation is to be found in the   
   > trial that the victorious Allies organized against the defeated   
   > Germans foes in the years following the War, at the German city of   
   > Nuremberg. The victorious allies were, of course, the United Stated of   
   > America, the Soviet Union of Josef Stalin, Great Britain and France.   
   > At this trial of the defeated German leaders, the Allies were   
   > simultaneously Judge, Jury, Prosecutor, and Hangman in their own case   
   > and in their own court. The Allies' Nuremberg trial was publicly   
   > condemned at the time by principled, leading Americans. The Chief   
   > Justice of the US Supreme Court, Judge Harlan F. Stone, condemned the   
   > trial as a "lynching". US Senator Robert Taft condemned the Allies'   
   > trial, as a "travesty and a perversion of justice". Taft described   
   > America's participation as a blot on the honor of the United States.   
   > Senator Taft predicted that in the future Europeans would condemn   
   > America for its participation in a "lynching".   
   >   
   > The standard rules of evidence were discarded. For example, the   
   > Allies held that their allegations of German atrocities, printed and   
   > published to saturation point in the Allies' war time-time press, were   
   > to be accepted at face value as "Public Knowledge" and were of such a   
   > notoriety that without any further independent, judicial   
   > investigation, the Allies' court could accept them as of probative   
   > value. If the Allies said it, then it could not be questioned.   
   >   
   > To their undying shame, the Allies employed torture to extract   
   > self-condemning confessions of guilt from their helpless prisoners. I   
   > will present here two notorious examples of vicious torture.   
   > We know that Rudolf Hoess, a former Kommandant at the Auschwitz was   
   > captured by a special unit of the British Army at the end of the   
   > Second World War, and we know that Hoess was tortured and beaten   
   > almost to the point of death, and then given a choice: either to   
   > confess to committing the murder of millions of Jews as Auschwitz, or   
   > else, he and his family, wife and children would suffer the   
   > consequences. Hoess' statement obtained under torture was presented   
   > and accepted at the Allies' court as proving the claim that Auschwitz   
   > in Poland is the location of the mass murder of millions. In response   
   > to rumors of abuses inflicted on German prisoners of war held captive   
   > by the US Army in post-War Germany, the American judge, Edward van   
   > Roden was commissioned by the US Army to investigate the situation.   
   > Van Roden examined German prisoners, and found that many had been   
   > tortured; that more than a hundred had had their testicles crushed   
   > beyond repair. These men had been tortured, as in the case of the   
   > Auschwitz Kommandant Hoess, in order to extract from them the   
   > self-condemning confessions of guilt that the Allies needed to   
   > buttress their propaganda-lies. On his return to the USA, Judge van   
   > Roden published his findings at press-conferences held in New York and   
   > Chicago.   
   >   
   > The "Holocaust" allegation is nothing but a propaganda-lie concocted   
   > by the war- time Allies Nuremberg lynching by the cynical trampling on   
   > all the principles of American and British jurisprudence.   
   >   
   > The disgrace that remains is that 70 years later across most of   
   > mainland Europe it is a criminal offense to question the findings of   
   > the Allies Nuremberg trial.   
      
   If the Jews had been exterminated, the lie would not continue to   
   live.   
        
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)