Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.religion.mormon    |    Mormon general discussion    |    3,192 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,328 of 3,192    |
|    Mihaela to Mihaela    |
|    Re: I found a case (1/2)    |
|    11 Dec 23 22:53:57    |
      From: mhristodor714@gmail.com              On Monday, December 11, 2023 at 10:49:33 PM UTC-8, Mihaela wrote:       > On Monday, December 11, 2023 at 10:47:52 PM UTC-8, Mihaela wrote:        > > On Monday, December 11, 2023 at 10:29:06 PM UTC-8, Mihaela wrote:        > > > On Monday, December 11, 2023 at 10:22:09 PM UTC-8, Mihaela wrote:        > > > > On Monday, December 11, 2023 at 10:18:23 PM UTC-8, Mihaela wrote:        > > > > > On Monday, December 11, 2023 at 3:06:02 PM UTC-8, Michael wrote:        > > > > > > On Monday, December 11, 2023 at 4:02:02 PM UTC-7, Michael wrote:        > > > > > > > https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/498/292/        > > > > > > >        > > > > > > > The grand jury occupies a unique role in our criminal justice       system. It is an investigatory body charged with the responsibility of       determining whether or not a crime has been committed. Unlike this Court,       whose jurisdiction is predicated        on a specific case or controversy, the grand jury "can investigate merely on       suspicion that the law is being violated, or even just because it wants       assurance that it is not." United States v. Morton Salt Co., 338 U. S. 632,       338 U. S. 642-643 (1950). The        function of the grand jury is to inquire into all information that might       possibly bear on its investigation until it has identified an offense or has       satisfied itself that none has occurred. As a necessary consequence of its       investigatory function, the        grand jury paints with a broad brush.        > > > > > > >        > > > > > > > "A grand jury investigation 'is not fully carried out until       every available clue has been run down and all witnesses examined in every       proper way to find if a crime has been committed.'"        > > > > > > >        > > > > > > > In short, the Government cannot be required to justify the       issuance of a grand jury subpoena by presenting evidence sufficient to       establish probable cause, because the very purpose of requesting the       information is to ascertain whether        probable cause exists        > > > > > > >        > > > > > > > This Court has emphasized on numerous occasions that many of the       rules and restrictions that apply at a trial do not apply in grand jury       proceedings. This is especially true of evidentiary restrictions. The same       rules that, in an adversary        hearing on the merits, may increase the likelihood of accurate determinations       of guilt or innocence do not necessarily advance the mission of a grand jury,       whose task is to conduct an ex parte investigation to determine whether or not       there is probable        cause to prosecute a particular defendant.        > > > > > > >        > > > > > > > Requiring the Government to explain in too much detail the       particular reasons underlying a subpoena threatens to compromise "the       indispensable secrecy of grand jury proceedings." United States v. Johnson,       319 U. S. 503, 319 U. S. 513 (1943).               > > > > > > >        > > > > > > > The investigatory powers of the grand jury are nevertheless not       unlimited. See Branzburg, supra, 408 U.S. at 408 U. S. 688; Calandra, supra,       414 U.S. at 414 U. S. 346, and n. 4. Grand juries are not licensed to engage       in arbitrary fishing        expeditions, nor may they select targets of investigation out of malice or an       intent to harass.        > > > > > > Justice STEVENS, with whom Justices MARSHALL and BLACKMUN join,       concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.        > > > > > > Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c) authorizes a Federal       District Court to quash or modify a grand jury subpoena duces tecum "if       compliance would be unreasonable or oppressive." See United States v.       Calandra, 414 U. S. 338, 414 U. S. 346,        n. 4 (1974). This rule requires the district court to balance the burden of       compliance        > > > > > > >        > > > > > > > Our task is to fashion an appropriate standard of        easonableness, one that gives due weight to the difficult position of subpoena       recipients but does not impair the strong governmental interests in affording       grand juries wide latitude,        avoiding minitrials on peripheral matters, and preserving a necessary level of       secrecy        > > > > > > >        > > > > > > > We begin by reiterating that the law presumes, absent a strong       showing to the contrary, that a grand jury acts within the legitimate scope of       its authority.        > > > > > ----        > > > > > Re:        > > > > > The investigatory powers of the grand jury are nevertheless not       unlimited. See Branzburg, supra, 408 U.S. at 408 U. S. 688; Calandra, supra,       414 U.S. at 414 U. S. 346, and n. 4. Grand juries are not licensed to engage       in arbitrary fishing        expeditions, nor may they select targets of investigation out of malice or an       intent to harass.        > > > > > ---        > > > > > I filed a complaint against you with grand jury in 2018 or 2019 I       have to look it up .        > > > > ----        > > > >        > > > > I filed a lots of complaints against you!        > > > > I told you each time I did it !        > > > > Ask Luigi!        > > > > I was emailing him, as I emailed you and email was not good .        > > > I filed complaints everywhere!        > > > With FBI, with OIG, with DOJ civil rights division, with OIG, with       everybody ! Grand Jury , Senate Judiciary Committee, everybody!        > > >        > > > So you might be watched for way longer then you think!!!        > > >        > > > That's why : speak the truth dude !!!        > > > You were observed for very long time !        > > > Is almost 7 years you do al, this crap to me !        > > > I didn't watched you screwing me !        > > > I filed several complaints!!!!        > > > I was in despair !!        > > > You didn't let me defend myself at least !        > > > Yep!        > > You don't throw people in jail just because you have a personal interest       to do so !        > > Or you dislike their face or their , color , or nationality , or what they       say or believe!        > >        > > Look at you!        > > You commit crimes and feel is j fair to go to jail!        > > How about me ? 12 fucking times dude innocent !        > >        > > What if somebody , decides not to give a shit about law amd takes you and       cages you for 3 month straight ? No hearings , nothing!        > > They give 2 chocolates to your defender amd she files fraudulent waivers f       your rights in court !        > >        > > When you are accused of committing a f crime ?        > > Falsely ?        > > You tell yourself : I know this is false ! No worries , will have my day       in court !        > > So you ease your mind, counting on that justice day !        > > For 7 years almost ?        > > My justice day never f comes dude!        > > And in those 7 years ?        > > You systematically robbed me of all I have:        > > My freedom, my right to live in the house I was owner of dude !!!!               [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca