From: drlmccoymd@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, December 21, 2023 at 6:37:14 PM UTC, Michael wrote:   
   > Looking at statements by president grant in 1865 and senators in 1871, they   
   mention guns fired and swords used.    
   >    
   > It is possible that insurrection or rebellion implies armed, how else could   
   one work for such purpose?    
   >    
   > Armed insurrection or armed rebellion. What the entire world saw was a   
   disruption of a technical proceeding.    
   >    
   > With all the people there, did any have guns with them? Yes, 3 people, one   
   of whom was an off duty DEA agent, and none brandished them.    
   >    
   > This was quite obvious not an insurrection, once you ignore any sesame   
   street interpretation.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)