XPost: alt.fan.neal.boortz, alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.usa   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution   
   From: none@none.com   
      
   On 3/27/2012 1:28 PM, George Conklin wrote:   
   > "Peter Franks"  wrote in message   
   > news:jkslf8$ir0$1@dont-email.me...   
   >> On 3/27/2012 7:04 AM, George Conklin wrote:   
   >>> "Neal Boortz"   wrote in message   
   >>> news:c4f6f05c1$0$61809$bb4e3ad8@WSB.com...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> First ... and I know I'm largely preaching to the choir here ... the   
   >>>> most   
   >>>> important thing the American people need to understand about ObamaCare   
   >>>> is   
   >>>> that it WAS NOT passed to make sure Americans had access to health care.   
   >>>> It was passed to address the number one priority of Democrats ---   
   >>>> solidifying power by making more and more people dependent on   
   >>>> government.   
   >>>   
   >>> Liar.  Obama was forced to pass RomenyCare in place of Medicare for All,   
   >>> which is not only consitutional, it would have been a better plan.   
   >>   
   >> How is it constitutional?   
   >>   
   >   
   > Romney put it in place.  It must be ok with the radical right.   
      
   Powers delegated to the state have no relation to powers delegated to   
   the nation.   
      
   What Romney did as governor of a state has no bearing on how the federal   
   government may legitimately act.   
      
   What is most amusing is that the fact that MA was able to   
   constitutionally enact socialized medicine is evidence that the feds   
   have no such power, ref. Amendment X.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)