home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics.medicine      talk.politics.medicine      20,955 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 18,991 of 20,955   
   Peter Franks to George Conklin   
   Re: Romeyacare hearings start today   
   27 Mar 12 16:11:47   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.neal.boortz, alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.usa   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution   
   From: none@none.com   
      
   On 3/27/2012 3:06 PM, George Conklin wrote:   
   > "Peter Franks"  wrote in message   
   > news:jkt9d0$juf$1@dont-email.me...   
   >> On 3/27/2012 1:28 PM, George Conklin wrote:   
   >>> "Peter Franks"   wrote in message   
   >>> news:jkslf8$ir0$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>> On 3/27/2012 7:04 AM, George Conklin wrote:   
   >>>>> "Neal Boortz"    wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:c4f6f05c1$0$61809$bb4e3ad8@WSB.com...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> First ... and I know I'm largely preaching to the choir here ... the   
   >>>>>> most   
   >>>>>> important thing the American people need to understand about ObamaCare   
   >>>>>> is   
   >>>>>> that it WAS NOT passed to make sure Americans had access to health   
   >>>>>> care.   
   >>>>>> It was passed to address the number one priority of Democrats ---   
   >>>>>> solidifying power by making more and more people dependent on   
   >>>>>> government.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Liar.  Obama was forced to pass RomenyCare in place of Medicare for   
   >>>>> All,   
   >>>>> which is not only consitutional, it would have been a better plan.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> How is it constitutional?   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Romney put it in place.  It must be ok with the radical right.   
   >>   
   >> Powers delegated to the state have no relation to powers delegated to the   
   >> nation.   
   >>   
   >> What Romney did as governor of a state has no bearing on how the federal   
   >> government may legitimately act.   
   >>   
   >> What is most amusing is that the fact that MA was able to constitutionally   
   >> enact socialized medicine is evidence that the feds have no such power,   
   >> ref. Amendment X.   
   >>   
   >   
   > What constitution right do you have for me to pay your medical bills when   
   > you show up at a hospital and demand free care?   
      
   A) No such thing as a constitutional rights.  The constitution protects   
   rights, it doesn't create nor grant them.   
      
   B) You are responsible for your own health and care.  I'm responsible   
   for mine.  You have no rights to provided health care, it is a benefit   
   of our society and a privilege to participate, insomuch as you are   
   financially competent and capable to pay for such care.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca