8eb60a23   
   XPost: sci.med, sci.med.nutrition, sci.life-extension   
      
   > "WRONG on all counts, of course. =A0:)   
   >   
   > It is NOT me talking, but the lead author himself, David Crews. =A0Five   
   > generations to date for animals, and 200 genrations for plants with no"   
   >   
   > The abstract you provided said 3 only. =A0I did not listen to the links.   
   > Plants seem hardly relevant to mammals.   
   >   
   > Do tell us, in how many animal species do the epigenetic on and off   
   state=   
   s   
   > persist?   
      
   "I pay a great deal of attention to what the key researchers have to say   
   about their own research study.  Only a SCIENCE MORON, like yourself, would   
   be arrogant to say otherwise."   
      
   The abstract you used said 3 only.  Pay attention to what you post.   
      
   "I gladly defer to the experts in the field of epigenetics, and will ignore   
   the babblings of educated SCIENCE morons.  :)"   
      
   Then it should be no problem to tell us how many switched on or off genes   
   persist for how many generations on average in how many species.   
      
   "You are just an obsolete fossil.  :)"   
      
   Smile, I was reading about epigenetics and commenting on it for more then   
   10 years, since the beginning.  You have only recently started to make   
   comment.   
      
   So we "fossles: have a thing or two to teach the new kids on the block.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)