XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.usa   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution   
   From: emoneyjoe@iglou.com   
      
   On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 08:53:31 -0700, george conklin   
    wrote:   
      
   >On 6/30/2012 5:33 PM, emoneyjoe wrote:   
   >   
   >>>   
   >>> Of course the problem is that when the people realize Obama saved them   
   >>>from the jaws of corporate death panels, they won't want to go back.   
   >>   
   >>         You must lay wake making up lies, nobody will   
   >> be saved by this piece of legislative monstrosity,   
   >> as usual you are trying to claim that republicans   
   >> would have done exactly what this bill does, take   
   >> away the right of a patient and his doctor to make   
   >> life and death health care decisions.   
   >>   
   >>        You are too lazy to write any more than canned   
   >> socialist propaganda.   
   >   
   >What you are saying is that any effort to insure freeloaders pay   
   >something into the system is "propaganda."  Freeloaders have big words   
   >to protect their parasite status.   
      
           There are damned few freeloaders that   
   can afford $100 a month health care insurance,   
   let alone what some of the family premiums are.   
      
           I think that means the freeloaders will get   
   free or almost free health care insurance if   
   they can survive until the IRS reimburses them.   
      
           Does that mean they have to pay premiums   
   for a year and then maybe get a big check back   
   sometime next year?   
      
      
          So it may not be propaganda because the   
   legislation authors are liberals that seem to   
   think the average American household has   
   $60,000 a year income, when reality sets in,   
   the real numbers may be half that, especially   
   for young families with children and the great   
   many single mothers with children and broken   
   homes with children and "deadbeat" dads.   
      
      
         I can only relate to my case in the late 1960s,   
   earning as little $1.65 an hour and paying $25   
   a week for two children from a divorce and $25   
   a week for two from a deceased mother which   
   Social Security sad, too bad, sorry, not currently   
   insured.   
      
      
        If I am right (I definitely am not left),   
   the program will be so confused people   
   will pull their hair out.   
        IRS agents will only consider income   
   and insurance premium amounts, nothing   
   else, feeding the kids won't be considered.   
        And debt payments won't be considered,   
   the insurance premium must come before   
   the mortgage, rent or utilities.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)