XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.usa.constitution   
   From: none@none.com   
      
   On 7/1/2012 2:19 PM, Josh wrote:   
   > On 7/1/2012 5:16 PM, Charles Bell wrote:   
   >> On Jun 29, 10:50 am, Peter Franks  wrote:   
   >>> On 6/28/2012 1:36 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> ObamaCare is still the law of the land, and we blame George W. Bush.   
   >>>   
   >>> No.  Blame those that enacted the law and upheld the law.  None of them   
   >>> understand the just purposes of government.   
   >>>   
   >>>> So what we have here is another 5-4 decision ...   
   >>>   
   >>> Divided we fall.   
   >>>   
   >>> Divide and conquer.   
   >>>   
   >>> Split decisions (and the power to even have them) is a simple recipe for   
   >>> destruction in any branch of government.   
   >>>   
   >>> The founders missed this point, or presumed that we'd make the necessary   
   >>> Constitutional changes (they were wrong).  It should be super-majority   
   >>> in legislative issues, unanimity in judicial issues.   
   >>   
   >> And yet conservatives will continue on and allow this never-   
   >> articulated in the Constitution process of judicial review to   
   >> continue.   
   >   
   > If it weren't for judicial review, the law couldn't even have been   
   > challenged.   
      
   Without judicial review, the law wouldn't have been enacted in the first   
   place.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)