XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.usa.constitution   
   From: user@nowhere.com   
      
   On 7/4/2012 4:39 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   > On 7/1/2012 2:19 PM, Josh wrote:   
   >> On 7/1/2012 5:16 PM, Charles Bell wrote:   
   >>> On Jun 29, 10:50 am, Peter Franks  wrote:   
   >>>> On 6/28/2012 1:36 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> ObamaCare is still the law of the land, and we blame George W. Bush.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> No.  Blame those that enacted the law and upheld the law.  None of them   
   >>>> understand the just purposes of government.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> So what we have here is another 5-4 decision ...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Divided we fall.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Divide and conquer.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Split decisions (and the power to even have them) is a simple recipe   
   >>>> for   
   >>>> destruction in any branch of government.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The founders missed this point, or presumed that we'd make the   
   >>>> necessary   
   >>>> Constitutional changes (they were wrong).  It should be super-majority   
   >>>> in legislative issues, unanimity in judicial issues.   
   >>>   
   >>> And yet conservatives will continue on and allow this never-   
   >>> articulated in the Constitution process of judicial review to   
   >>> continue.   
   >>   
   >> If it weren't for judicial review, the law couldn't even have been   
   >> challenged.   
   >   
   > Without judicial review, the law wouldn't have been enacted in the first   
   > place.   
      
   How's that?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)