XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.usa.constitution   
   From: none@none.com   
      
   On 7/4/2012 2:59 PM, Josh wrote:   
   > On 7/4/2012 4:39 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >> On 7/1/2012 2:19 PM, Josh wrote:   
   >>> On 7/1/2012 5:16 PM, Charles Bell wrote:   
   >>>> On Jun 29, 10:50 am, Peter Franks  wrote:   
   >>>>> On 6/28/2012 1:36 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> ObamaCare is still the law of the land, and we blame George W. Bush.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No.  Blame those that enacted the law and upheld the law.  None of   
   >>>>> them   
   >>>>> understand the just purposes of government.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> So what we have here is another 5-4 decision ...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Divided we fall.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Divide and conquer.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Split decisions (and the power to even have them) is a simple recipe   
   >>>>> for   
   >>>>> destruction in any branch of government.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The founders missed this point, or presumed that we'd make the   
   >>>>> necessary   
   >>>>> Constitutional changes (they were wrong).  It should be super-majority   
   >>>>> in legislative issues, unanimity in judicial issues.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And yet conservatives will continue on and allow this never-   
   >>>> articulated in the Constitution process of judicial review to   
   >>>> continue.   
   >>>   
   >>> If it weren't for judicial review, the law couldn't even have been   
   >>> challenged.   
   >>   
   >> Without judicial review, the law wouldn't have been enacted in the first   
   >> place.   
   >   
   > How's that?   
      
   "Wickard thus establishes that Congress can regulate purely intrastate   
   activity..."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)