XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.usa.constitution   
   From: none@none.com   
      
   On 7/4/2012 4:10 PM, Josh wrote:   
   > On 7/4/2012 6:36 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >> On 7/4/2012 2:59 PM, Josh wrote:   
   >>> On 7/4/2012 4:39 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> If it weren't for judicial review, the law couldn't even have been   
   >>>>> challenged.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Without judicial review, the law wouldn't have been enacted in the   
   >>>> first   
   >>>> place.   
   >>>   
   >>> How's that?   
   >>   
   >> "Wickard thus establishes that Congress can regulate purely intrastate   
   >> activity..."   
   >   
   > Without judicial review, Wickard would have never been a court case and   
   > the law at stake would be on the books - which too would have   
   > established that Congress can regulate purely intrastate activities.   
      
   Really, how can Congress establish its powers?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)