XPost: alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.usa.constitution   
   From: none@none.com   
      
   On 7/4/2012 3:22 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   > On 7/4/2012 2:58 PM, Josh wrote:   
   >> On 7/4/2012 4:33 PM, Peter Franks wrote:   
   >>> On 7/2/2012 3:41 AM, Josh wrote:   
   >>>> Apart from ideology, you don't think Miers was simply unqualified?   
   >>>> Remember the answers to the questionnaire and the fear about what she   
   >>>> would have said during the hearings.   
   >>>   
   >>> What qualifies one to be a judge?   
   >>   
   >> Being able to answer that questionnaire is one qualification.   
   >   
   > That is arbitrary.   
   >   
   > What qualifies one to be a judge?   
   >   
   > In other words, what are the requisite qualifications in order to serve   
   > in a judicial capacity.   
      
   Oh, OK.   
      
   Well, let me posit the first and most important qualification: impartiality.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)