XPost: alt.fan.neal.boortz, alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.elections
XPost: alt.politics.obama
From: emoneyjoe@iglou.com
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 15:04:11 -0700, "Freedom Dude"
wrote:
>"emoneyjoe" wrote in message
>news:eg7hv7d11nsq5frlu0k8mrbeo2ikipj73r@4ax.com...
>
>On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 13:01:24 -0700, "Freedom Dude"
> wrote:
>
>>"BeamMeUpScotty" wrote in message
>>news:4FF87B0E.6000202@blackhole.nebulax.com...
>>
>>On 7/6/2012 8:23 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote:
>>> On 7/3/2012 10:00 AM, Neal Boortz wrote:
>>>> Leading up to the decision on ObamaCare, I gave the Republicans a hard
>>>> time for not having their act together and being unprepared to handle
>>>> whatever news came their way from the Supreme Court decision. Then the
>>>> decision was handed down and the Republicans were tossed a giant hunk of
>>>> red PR meat: The Supreme Court had ruled that ObamaCare is a tax and a
>>>> big, fat tax at that
>>>
>>> Fat tax, Kneel? Simply a lie. The tax penalty is expected to affect on
>>> 1% of the population. Move on.
>>
>>
>>The GAY Marriage laws will effect less than 1% of the population. so ban
>>it and call it a wash. Move on.
>
> *BeamMeUpScotty's Rule*
>
>:#41 - When we lived under a constitution we were a Nation of LAWS.
>:===========================================================
>:Why rightards like to lie and twist things? Tax or no tax the healthcare is
>:now the law of the land. The so called "free loaders" which rightards
>:always use when it fits their agenda, is no more! All rightards should now
>:be happy. Case closed.
>
> You and Dano really need to try to learn a
>newsreader that inserts quote markers.
>
>
> This freeloader charge keeps coming up,
>and it is demeaning to those that don't have
>the resources to carry insurance, and to all
>those who do pay their own health care bills.
>
> What you call "the law of the land" is such
>a mess, if not repealed, will cause so many
>problems the states and the IRS won't be
>able to handle them.
>
> The laws passed by the Pelosi congress
>are already causing hundreds of thousands
>to lose their jobs, unfortunately not all can
>be repealed.
>
>
> It looks like you all will be sorry you got
>what you asked for, or have been hoodwinked
>into believing you asked for them.
>=================================================
>No, you're wrong. We like this healthcare law, it can be improved, of
>course.
>What I really like to see is everybody on Medicare. That would eliminate the
>middle-man. Have you ever seen an insurance agent treat a sick person?
>Have a good day!
Who do you think pays the Medicare bills,
it isn't the government, they job out the claim
approval and bookkeeping.
Medicare Part A was supposedly paid in
the FICA taxes for an entire working life,
for a person to have Part A while working
there would have to be a premium besides
the FICA taxes.
Part B, 80% of the doctor bills and
outpatient services costs over $100 a month
now, and I pay $204.75 a month for the
20% supplemental AARP Plan C (which
is supposed to also cover 2 years extended
stay).
Not every doctor accepts Medicare
assignment, and unless the doctor has
a good bookkeeper he may lose money
on Medicare.
This ACA should have been about
10 different bills, not one monstrosity,
it rambles on about 100 different things,
as if the Pelosi congress wanted to take
over the world.
I don't think it can work, there are
too many people that are exempt,
and more can become exempt by
becoming a preacher.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
