d43df92b   
   XPost: misc.health.alternative, sci.med.nutrition, sci.life-extension   
      
   > "Proof that Vitamin D prevents ColoRectal Cancer in humans   
   >   
   > This research study is a good test of your I.Q. as a high level of   
   > intelligence is required to properly interpret it.   
   >   
   > The study NEVER bothered to define "CRC," But CRC appears to stand for   
   > ColoRectal Cancer.   
   >   
   > See Discussion Section of Full Text."   
   >   
   > Giggle. =A0No claim to "prevent" nor "proof" made, usual possible risk   
   > factors identified which "may" and "influence" etc. etc. in an otherwise   
   > standard paper.   
   >   
   > conclusion, levels of age-related CGI methylation in the healthy human   
   > rectal mucosa are influenced by gender, the availability of folate,   
   vitam=   
   in   
   > D and selenium, and perhaps by factors related to systemic inflammation.   
   >   
   > Of the sevral factors, of which age was identified as the prime one, one   
   > was picked out for reasons obviously not scientific. =A0All in all, the   
   a=   
   bove   
   > remarks and claims have all the hallmarks of an amateur, no comment on   
   iq=   
   .   
   >   
   > Where oh where did all that anti-science ranting go all of a sudden.   
      
   "Ha, ... hah, Ha!"   
      
   Hmm, it is it the manic phase now?   
      
   "Tell me another tall tale.  With all your learned education and PhDs, YOU   
   actually have the nerve to tell me that AGE is the primary risk factor for   
   AGE related cancer."   
      
   Nope, that was the conclusion of the paper.   
      
   "Boy what a moron!  Next time, try telling me something that I don't   
   already know."   
      
   As said, no comment on iq will be made.   
      
   "I did read the paper, Arse; after all."   
      
   I did see it was an amateur effort, after all.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)